this has to be bait right this cant be your actual opinion
Not at all. They used the challenger 2 LEP chassis because it was already modified to fit the 130 (part that was needed for the chally 3 program) and at that time rheinmetall didn’t have a leopard ready to fit the 130 without major modifications
not bait I’m dead serious we have australian vehicles in USA and now Britain its a mess
Britain has absolutely nothing comparable or equivalent to 2 x fire and forget mavericks at 9.7 in ground.
The lowest BR FnF munitions Britain gets are 3x Martels on the 10.3 Buccaneer, and the lowest mavericks are on the 10.7 Hawk 200. Currently British CAS at 9.x has to try and compete with Mavericks using Bullpups and dumb bombs.
for this reason we get 2 m1a1 squadron vehicles for australia in 2 dif major trees
im not to knowledgeable on it ill be fr but i pray brittain gets it because it looks so damn cool
britain is a mess because of how?
not really as if im not mistaken Australian vehicles in the future would be going to the UK and I would assume Canada as well since there are more Canadian and Australian vehicles in the british tree then any other tree
German tanks always look cool :3 but it’s just a basic challanger nothing special the " addon armour" was likely just sheet metal
but why is Britain getting m1a1 squadron and USA had one for some time now its like Gaijin is just moving on from giving USA any sub trees
there are unique modifications of existing aircraft that aren’t in the game I.E: P40 N/M and typhoon N.F mk1 b etc. not everything is about meta btw that’s a sad way to look at games imo.
so it wont change much why would u want it , it looks the same too
no i would 1000% call putting a vehicle that under any normal circumstance would be in X tree because thats where its from in Y tree, controversial.
because the US is in no need of sub trees? like i dont get why US players want a sub tree, they boast about all of their additions but then still want a sub tree even though it add s nothing to them as the only Sub trees that make sense for the US mainly use US / analogues to US equipment meaning it adds nothing new
All of australias vehicles other than that AIM were already in the british tree.
and australia is finally a full on Subtree, which it should have been from the start.
Sometimes we even get folders for vehicles with next to no relation

the great thing about foldered vehicles is that if you have no interest in playing them you can skip them
i want them because there are unique traits they dont share with other models of the same plane ie the typhoon NF mk1b has a radar
if sub trees aren’t messy then tell me why austraila has 2 12.0 tank squadrons with the name m1a1 and the other one m1a1 aim in 2 did major trees
separate problem