the 2a7hu i believe was added with a subtree and america ground doesnt need “fixing” they just need a better cas aircraft
there is 0 way the t90m is a sepv3 counterpart and the 2a7 is again over rated to all hell the 2a7 and sepv2 are sidegrades to eachother
dov blegs have been boring so far, this kind of feels like a gap filler episode
true they need better cas but their ground is suffering just as much just look at the numbers of the sepv2 win rate
Yes way they were pretty much made around the same time period with very similar technology
I somehow completely forgot this existed…
They have a few, but nothing ground breaking compared to Indonesia.
Malaysia have their ForceShield SAM system which is very similar to Indonesian Starstreak setup. It uses ControlMaster 200 radar and three different launcher setups. The launcher vehicles can operate independently from the radar too. The main functional difference to Indonesia is that iirc Malaysia doesn’t have LMM Martlet, only Starstreak, but aside from the basic LML launchers it is compatible.
ControlMaster 200 radar
GK-M1 LML
Starstreak used with basic LML launcher that can fit up to 3 missiles. They are manually (SACLOS) guided through an optical sight. Mounted to a domestic GK-M1 chassis.
They also used Starburst-VML on Land Rover chassis for an earlier SACLOS SAM
Thailand is somewhat similar.
They also use Starstreak, but from what I could find only base LML launchers. They are mounted to domestic Thairung MU4 chassis.
But Thailand also uses RBS-70, which is placed on the roof of domestic Thairung Transformer vehicles.
I couldn’t find exact answers for what radar is used with them, if any. The closest I could find was mentions that these were deployed alongside TRML-3D/32 (same as used with Thai VL MICA).
TRML-3D/32 seen in the background here, deployed with Starstreak and RBS-70 alongside Bofors 40mm cannons
DEFENSE STUDIES: RTAF STEEL CHALLENGE 2023 Royal Thai Air Force Force Power Test 2023 in Conjunction with the Royal Thai Army
Another one would also be ADATS, but this doesn’t really count since it’s used as a stationary system. While it could in theory work on a vehicle since it’s self contained, this was never actually done. It also lacks integrated radar, and instead is linked to Skyguard FCS (I don’t have photos, but it wouldn’t work in game anyways)
So generally Indonesia is the best bet for SACLOS SAM here, even if the others can bring some unique domestic chassis and Starburst could be a nice lower BR option.
1 Like
the sepv2 winrate is only bad because us mains are terrible the m1a2t which is a worse tank but with better players has a 1.40 K/D putting it 0.15 higher than the sepv2 and putting it 7th best at top tier because chinese mains are amazing either
time period has nothing to do with it and technology doesnt matter with how pitiful the t90m is
Seems like the sepv3 went into production even before the T90M
Brochacho name 5 things the m1a2t is worse than the sepv2
kind of a given but changes again absolutely nothing
not much at all but name 5 things its better at
but gaijin does not based addition of tank with the year they entered… your not making any sense
1 Like
thank you whatever your name is
racim.
Rakim mentioned
Yea but u acting like this thing is some crazy next gen mbt when in reality is has some solid small upgrades from the v2
never was arguing based on date it just got brung up so i replied but yes i agree
lets see.
DU hull
Upgraded turret armour
more advanced fire control system
M829A4
APU (no affect in game)
Trophy APS
newer CROWS system
3rd generation thermal sights
new suspension and power distribution to compensate for the extra weight
even if it was only given m829a3 hell even m829a2 it would be instantly the best tank in the game