So just call it “AESA radar” instead of a different radars designation…
we dont know the specs of its radar either, and its believed the j15t and j16 use a radar similar to thw KLJ-10A so they used that, cant really place a radar in a jet that we know nothing about so its the best fit
1 Like
at the same time what are we gonna model this “AESA Radar” off?
isnt better to just use the KLJ-10A place holder then
1 Like
the specs are unknown so the KLJ-10A is the best fit right now as the radar on the J15T is believed to share a lot of the same tech as the KLJ-10A
Literally everything about the KLJ-10A apart from the name is also made up
So they’re basing a unknown radar of of a imaginary radar
this is what happens when modern classified stuff gets added, guesses and estimations are made, this will be the same issue with stealth or advanced bvr missiles like meteor, aim174
1 Like
we cant have the right specs if they’re classified, so deal with it
Im not complaining about the specs or name just the stupid reply which contradicts itself
how? im being serious, how does the reply contradict itself
“We cant change x name randomly withouth basis”
→ gives the KLJ-10A to the 15T’s randomly without basis
There are 0 sources even remotely claiming its so.
The nose on the 2 jets are completely different size and shapes.
there is some basis, the radar that is in the j15t is VERY similar to the KLJ-10A, and as its the closest fit, it makes sense to place it and yes the nose cone is too big but hey, this is the issue with having very modern classified stuff in a game about realism, at some point its gonna be hard if not impossible to get the name and rough specs
could ask for the SU33s N001K as yk, the basis is that the J15T and SU33 are the same jet so theoretically should fit AND work
Before you continue making stuff up do back it up with some sources.
The literal only thing known about the 2 radars are that they’re both AESA radas mounted at an angle.
do you have any evidence that they aren’t similar?
The same amount as you have… literally no information is available. Its stupid to think a jet put into service in 2024 has a “very similar” radar as a jet put into service back in 2018 when they’re 2 completely different size classes
there is nothing that can be done without making up a new radar, if and you’re upset about that wait until you find out it shares the same cockpit as the J11B it also has airframe differences as well
Wait till I found out?
I literally called it before we even knew it was being added.
And you’re the one that seems to be “upset” im only calling out hypocrisy.Nnot complaining about the name specs or cockpit, I dont care about it.
Gaijin is lazy beyond belief they couldn’t even be bothered to get the few known aspects correct. Ive given up way back i dont care anymore.
But Gaijins and the CM’s hypocrisy is laughable and I will call it out.
Anyways this is moderately off topic so no point in replying anymore
this is because chinese stuff is highly classified, and gaijin is lazy yes, but you cant do much when the specs of the radar is classified, they can make a radar out of thin air but people will get mad, if they dont and use an existing radar, people will get mad, they cant win because its classified, all thats known its a 3 sided AESA radar, same as the J16
1 Like
Guy’s either move it to DM’s or leave each other alone!
Sure and my message gets deleted not the one spreading blatant misinformation lol
1 Like