I want all 3 of them and we kinda need revolution before Technologieträger
I dunno… I think that’s way too bulky… I prefer small/compact MBTs like the japanese Type 10. The Leopard 2A-RC 3.0 kinda missed the chance to shrink the base chassis (even if that would mean it’s a whole new tank) as the unmanned turret is already way smaller than the manned variant (looks like a small head on a big body lol). Smaller and lighter → better ability to hide, transport and cross bridges while being less ressource intensive (building and maintaining) and giving a smaller target with a smaller signature.
If 2a7 does get is D-tech hull, then how much improvement will the hull armor have?
“same protection as the turret” is a phrase I’ve heard going around, so more or less that
(correct me if I’m wrong)
I wouldn’t mind having an 11.0 Leopard to use alongside the Puma though
1 Like
YES
They need to declassify a apfsds/apds whatever it had
It was APFSDS, but yeah :(
It would just take another 5 years for Gaijin to give it that.
But the HWS would be also cool :)
I feel like the lack of Top MBT additions in the past 2 years have frustrated me too much to settle for feet dragging, hahah.
I NEED MORE OF THE BEST OF THE BESSST
Armatas, SEPv3s, 2A8s, CR3s, gimmeeee!
So- while I will welkome the Indonesian Revolution for being a Japanese addition and “good enough”, I hope nations like Germany, etc, get some of their best available options (ideally, service vehicles, like 2A8, 2A7A1, 2A6A3…)
2 Likes
Well don’t sources depend between apfsds and apds hot atgms as a option would be really nice too
~600 ish maybe. But it is better than C Hull, which should be ~480 and B Hull, ~320
I feel like it’s probably more complex than we’d even expect. Sure in concept a lot of it is “just UI”, but that is still a lot of UI changes.
And while the actual mechanics generally based around existing mechanics, I can’t look behind the scenes, so I couldn’t say if that actually makes it easier to implement. For example while we already have separated research trees as just the way they do branches (Air, Ground, etc.), I don’t know if implementing a similar thing by nation would be as simply as reusing that functionality, or bring some issues I don’t know of.
Personally I think it’s something they should take their time with if they do implement it. When making the suggestion I found a lot of small things that could inconvenience players, even some that I missed and had to fix later on after others pointed them out.
As much as I think it’s needed, I don’t think this would go well if they rush it.
6 Likes
I had to do a whole suggestion update just to work around this feature…
2 Likes
Of course they should take their time to do it well, I’m just saying on a technical matter there’s probably not much fundamental to reform, it’s mostly the UI that would be changed in depth
1 Like
9 Likes
Hopefully ARM, MMW and ECM to make CAS easier :P
1 Like
Smin, super quick question, speaking of the MB-326s. Is there any chance the K will also pop up in the British Tech Tree, being that the Italians originally built it for the South African AF?
Should also get a Tunisian Skin for that one. Though the Italian test camo is quite nice!