Yeah, it was on the old forum.
But copying it over was considered plagiarism. So i couldn’t do it.
But it’s air is pretty unique as well all things considered. But it also contains the usual C&P.
It sounds stupid, but you have to believe me on my word for this one. I don’t know if someone is perhaps making a new proposal though.
at the end of the day, it’s about a single TT. If 21 nations would make a more unique TT then a TT with only 1 nation, it would be rather peculiar to add the nation with 1 TT because it consist of only 1 nation.
So if a single TT can be more unique with a coalition, i’d prefer to play that over a nation which is less unique but consists of 1 nation alone.
I do understand the significance of Poland, but i’d rather see it as sub-TT. Especially since Poland also imported a ton, especially at top tier.
Or, a central European alliance TT, with Serbia, Slovak, Czech, Poland, Bulgaria and Bosnia.
they can take the rack from the r77 and put the adaptors so they can carry micas, i don’t know if they have done it but if they have such planes does not have a place in the game
Took a look at the suggestion
It’s great, love to see zero rank 1 vehicles, copy paste low tier
Primary uniqueness of the tree comes from light vehicles but thats it, compared to Poland that has uniqueness in basically everything but low tier-mid tier
What does Ukraine have to do with the (lack of) existence of dual rack MICA?
No one is arguing whether or not it can use it on its own, we know it can. The primary argument (that’s very obviously shifted now) is about whether or not it could have 12 MICA, which it can’t
Sure wonder what Poland, Czechoslovakia, Korea and many more nations went trough in similar decades
Still it’d be much better to start it off at higher tier like Israel currently is or give African Union vehicles equipped with 50 cals like US halftracks, etc. .
Leftovers from WW2 were also present in nations like Egypt and more.
African battalions did have their own markings on tanks, planes, etc… So perhaps these could be added in the lower tiers?
But then again, that would most likely be C&P. At top tier, the African Union TT might be more interesting and sellable.
Especially around the cold war era, where they modified and experimented a lot.
It already heavily is.
But it’d also bring in unique stuff like Egyptian upgraded Italian tanks with 2 pdr and more.
Even avoiding African divisions, it still has the ability to provide low tier trough Egypt.
Well I don’t agree with some of the arguments here, I also don’t agree with stuffing as many nations as possible into one tree.
We’ve seen what happens, with more nations in one tree, more “C&P”. As the have more nations to take it from, over having to fill the space with unique vehicles as there is less “C&P” to pick from. It’s the reason why I object to a “commonwealth tree” as with the 56-ish nations, there’d be zero unique vehicles as they’d be no need for unique vehicles as there wouldn’t be spaces not filled by copy and paste unlike trees with smaller nation counts.
So stuff like Poland or CANZ would be 10x better then a continent and a bit as a tree. Yes some C&P would be needed but even the WT majors have C&P. (V4 is pushing it for me and anything with 5+ nations is to many.)
Yet it is directly excluding vehicles exported to the nation and more. (BMPT, T-72AV, T-72UA1, etc. . ) Are these vehicles not “copy paste” just because (with the BMPT that wasn’t present in game before) aren’t in game? Or just because these nations are not in War Thunder?
How much of the tree is also made up of lightly modified vehicles?
It is heavily copy and paste