Sadly no proof of integration on any of these. Only the Hunter and Harrier is known.
The brochure with the silhouettes was just potential customer aircraft.
1 Like
Polish L3 isnt real, it cant hurt you
Polish L3:
TKS 20 my beloved little rat
So no SRAAM for Tornado/F-4 Phantom?
Sad /s
MiG-21S sells well too, why shouldn’t an Early phantom?
I proposed 9.3 for the F4F early because I compare it to the MiG-21F-13/PFM/S which are also Supersonic, much more agile and have comparable missiles
since the F4F doesn’t have Radar missiles the better radar doesn’t make a difference for it so I excluded it from the BR calculation
F4D with AIM-7E2 would be 11.0-11.3 just like the F4E, which is why I proposed weaker missiles to keep the BR down
I’m generally a Fan of lower BRs at the cost of worse armarment
1 Like
This is likely the week bois
For what?
which week? the first blog week?
the week of all weeks
Its THE Week :)
“TITLE CARD” here
The CM disclosures week
1 Like
500 CM disclosures
oh… sad
Hey @Smin1080p
I’m curious what the official response is for the US not getting weaponry like the AGM-187A JAGM-F and GBU-53 Stormbreaker yet.
The GBU-53 has been shown on the F/A-18F, F-15E, and F-16D Block 50. And the AGM-187A JAGM-F has been shown on the F-15E. Both weapons have official brochures.
Seeing as we have equivalents of these weapons in game (JAGM-F ~= Brimstone) (Stormbreaker ~= SPICE-250), why have these not been implemented? Can we expect to see them in the future?
1 Like
quick question, guys, why is the Su30mkk at 13.3 ?
Because it’s Russian and Russia needs to dominate.
Hence the Sovietsky Soyuz is better then the biggest ships ever build IRL (eventhough that thing wasnt even build, only like 10% or something),
Planes are encredibly good and at a lower br then their counterparts,
Unrealistic performing ERA while NATO doesn’t get their counter APFSDS to counter Russian ERA,
Russia gets the best SPAA’s ingame, no NATO has an equivalantly powerfull SPAA compared to the Russian ones ingame. Also, China got the Tor-M1 while Russia got the Pantsir, which is exponentially better then the Tor-M1, while at the same br, eventhough Russia could have gotten the Tor-M1 instead of the Pantsir.
So yeah… Now you see the BMPT as well, ruining top tier for everyone. The new unneccesary pantsir addition disabling NATO vehicles of destroying Russian ground forces through CAS, basically allowing Russian teams to stomp on NATO.
3 Likes
It’s Chinese :P
But seriously though the answer is simply money. OP undertiered premiums like the Su-30MKK and MK2 make bank. They also attract really bad players, who then give them bad stats, which Gaijin can use to say they deserve their low BR.
Oh, an F-14D will definitely have AIM-120s if comes. Severely underBRed Su-30s print money with 6 R-77s.
It would be a Gaijin classic to waste a fan request tech tree aircraft only to not relabel F-18C early as F-18A+ and give AMRAAMs.
I mean, both MK2 and MKK are just worse than their 13.7 “counterparts” as this community likes to compare them. The premiums have worse radars, engines and are overall just heavier and slower. Its more or less the question of the still horrid compression