Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

hoonigan was never the same after he passed, its a sad thing to see.

1 Like

Must have been awhile ago surely?

1 Like

A week ago (probably less)…

Check your IFF filters. Either by using the key bind or the onscreen hud options. (look here: TWS BUG? Is it me doing something wrong here or is the radar not working properly? - #2 by Necronomica)

yes i fixed it thank you. wasnt aware that feature was added

1 Like

did the BMPT’s lfp armour get buffed? the rdf cant pen it anymore

Spoiler

Nothing has changed

no it has i think, i remember on release and months after i could lfp pen the BMPT. i know that cause its the only weakspot i went for in the front.

I just looked trough the Datamines, as Said, nothing has Changed armor wise…

Just some Eco changes as a result of BR changes + it lost its Arty Call

i know im not insane, the BMPT used to be able to get lfp penned by the rdf and tvl

edit: you still can lfp the BMPT-72 but you used to be able to lfp the tech tree one aswell im certain of it

i let you, and i hope beside you too

Fair, it probably would. But it doesn’t fit suggestion rules unless something specific to it was made.

image

Gaijin can of course always make exceptions, but that isn’t really something to be expected and more something they do when there’s no other options (old German WW2 top tier, Ho-Ri Production) or they make mistakes in their research (Ho-Ri prototype, F-16AJ)*.

*
  • Ho-Ri Prototype was intended to be a partially constructed prototype of the Ho-Ri. Sadly it’s based on a mockup of an entirely different, never built version that’s even still wrongly represented.

  • The F-16AJ is based on the false idea that the YF-16A Sparrow testbed was a prototype for the Japanese F-16 proposal, and that the F-16J directly turned into the F-16ADF. Instead the Sparrow testbed was an unrelated earlier test, and while both the F-16J proposal and later ADF were based on it, they were made by entirely different specifications.

2 Likes

Speaking of fictional stuff to add when a nation has anything just gotta get to the next update and I win a bet that Sweden won’t get a fictional FnF helicopter.

Only option they have is Denmark and I don’t see us having our helis added anytime soon. Nor snail caring enough to fill that gap despite people constantly saying they’re gaijins favorite nation lol.

As for the Ho Ri idk if gaijin will ever get rid of it, there nothing to replace it with

1 Like

I mean I was expecting the Type 99 HSP to be the replacement it’s just about the closest in capability. Since that’s already here I don’t know what more they want.

Maybe the actual Ho-Ri to directly replace the vehicle rather than the role, but then they’d need to correct their mistakes instead of adding the fake ones to more games (Gaijins Ho-Ri designs are in Enlisted and WTM too)

Oh you mean single famous photo where mock-ups mounted on airframe?

I wonder why there is no single fire footage, or demonstrator that shows seeker capabilities, thats right because missile doesnt exist in any form aside from bein mock-up.

You guys delibarelty avoiding any questions about KH-38MT by showing single questionable photo and claiming its real while many sources indicates its the other way around.

Please spare me that lame excuse.

1 Like

There wasnt any firing footage of many modern Russian munitions until the last couple of years. Even now, some known ones still dont have clear footage.

Its not been a requirement to have something in game that it must have footage. Otherwise many modern things wouldn’t make it.

Please do not diverge from the topic. Its been spammed enough already here and is exactly why I said its been answered so many times so we dont have to go down another off topic spiral yet again.

2 Likes

Yeah there is also zero credible sources about test firing nor seeker performance.

Even most credible sources states current seeker should be gen 1 with much worse zoom capabilities and detection/tracking range yet somehow it has better zoom and thermals than most dedicated TGP’s at top tier.

Is that so? Then can we get MICA missiles for Gripen E since SAAB advertise that its compatible with airframe and FCS, oh wait you guys actually denied that due to lacking footage nor test results.

Rules for thee but not for us I guess…

Its been spammed multiple times because Gaijin added such a controversial weapon system that has no credible sources and ignored all those concerns so naturally that was expected to be happen.

3 Likes

Thsts not correct. It has not been denied for footage. Simply the information thus far has not been sufficient to show it actually was. Its nothing to do with requiring footage.

Gripen E has both Brimstone and SPICE. There is no footage for either on Gripen. Yet it has both due to offical sources.

2 Likes

Like KH-38MT case?

There is no proper information about its performance/seeker, let alone having actual test results yet Gaijin decided to add with imaginary specs.

Official sources also indicates that its compatible with MICA so what’s stopped Gaijin adding the weapon system?

I understand you have nothing do with additions in this game but please stop trying to defend one of most questionable addition in this game.

2 Likes

Not at all.

Its about confirming compatability with Gripen. The KH-38 family compatability is well known.

Many of those sources also offer conflicting information about other systems that may not have been and offer only what may be for potential customers.

Again, it has SPICE and Brimstone without footage. So the claim footage is required is not correct. Simply clearer information is needed. But there is nothing against it getting them if that info comes to light.

I will ask for a final time to please now stop with the off topic. Since you ignored the first one. Again, this was the very reason why I said it has been answered so many times. Because its just used as an opportunity to derail the topic.