Okay, I’m actually a little stumped about April’s PttD.
Can a suggestion moderator please explain to me why Sweden needs 2 M8’s recommended in a row? It wasn’t even a vehicle Sweden used domestically, they captured 4 during a UN intervention in an African nation (can’t remember which exactly, though I thought it was the Congo).
I was kinda bummed it got recommended in March, because Sweden still has so much domestic stuff that could be recommended instead, but it was fine.
But two M8’s in a row? Why? That is literally half of the M8 force Sweden ever used.
I am aware of Gaijin’s policy regarding the KV-1B, but back when the KV-1 m1942 was added to Scandinavia, it was said in the dev stream that it was also to be added to the Soviet TT. Any update on that, since it’s been near 1.5 years since it was added?
Yeah I dont think making all former soviet occupied lands part of their tree is a good idea, firstly because people from the NATO allied ones would despise this and it would probably cause DDOS attacks more often, and secondly the soviets can just get the CSTO stuff
still doesnt matter if you compare all 3 aesa ef the british one is the best performing when the italian one has the least matches played so there is flaws in that idea
also if you do compare the rafale m which has a similar ammount of played matched next to the euro its still got a way worse K/D
Just dropping in to say it’s likely that we get the CM post for the upcoming update sometime in the next two weeks, if previous patterns still continue.