That would best to ask that question in Infantry WIP topics.
1 Like
Kangaroo, where for art thou Kangaroo?
Watch me not get accepted again but anyhow Rapido got my money this time : P
bikelane that large ?
An other proof of WT’s lack of realism /s
It doesn’t matter how much attention they’ve had, seeing that the result of the word is so sloppy and low effort.
This is the “challenger 3” but it’s indicative of the lack of care and attention that is paid to some vehicles. Christ, we’ve been waiting how long for a ready rack fix as well as a long list of others.
Like I said, it doesn’t matter if they had 6 months of development if the result is of such poor quality.
8 Likes
Should pl12 be fixed?
1 Like
Summon Smin and ask him
Challenger 3 was not part of the rework I was reffering too with the Challenger 2.
This is a seperate modeling issue to be resolved.
Oh hey look it summoned Smin
Smin has a bot that detects certain keywords on the forum
Yeah like Finnish and KV-1B and a launch nukes button for when I ask questions about Finland
Also EAP
Or I was just tagged )))
That’s not as fun though, btw when Gripen E remodel?
No current plans to speak of. The whole visual model is not in need of a rework
There is a report open on the flap/wing area however.
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT hello, can i ask if the BRs have or can be looked by for these tanks or even the base VT-4 :DD it performs basically worse than the MBT-2000 (worse mobility, negligible armour diff, same shell) but is two BR steps above and Rank 8.
1 Like
Have fun with that beauty!
1 Like
Minor nation tax, when T14 and SepV3 will eventually arrive expect the VT4A1 to be 13.x :)))
thank god, the game sounds terrible by default.
Though lets hope they mean May 2026