Rafale after F/A-18 and maybe Su30 will be placed in the same line as well
2 Likes
But isn’t that naval line? Carrier based Rafale would make sense in F-18 line up, but why SU-30 in that line and what about non carrier based Rafale?
1 Like
i feel both rafale c and the su30MKI would be placed under the Tornado f.3 late and there getting rafale m which would be under the hornet
2 Likes
This does make sense
“For other MANPADS systems, open sources indicate a higher overload such as 18, 20 and even 25g in the case of the Mistral 1 MANPADS. However, these MANPADS systems have only slight differences in the area of aerodynamic surfaces compared to the 9M39”
4 Likes
is this real?
Next update: we have been working hard on infantry as we know theres no future for war thunder. So here is another f16 and a boat
Yes
not a hug
im getting angery
3 Likes
This thing absolutely dominated 8.7 squadron battles for years, it still gives me nightmares.
yeah sqaudron battles in realistic battles idk what makes it better than the G91 or the A4
1 Like
dud’s confirmed?
Zusammenfassung
Same! The Fokker bombers like the T.V would be cool too!
And I would love a Dutch P-51, saw the one in Soesterberg and it’s a beauty!
2 Likes
Yeah, I agree with that
That one looks cool!
I hope for more WW2/Allied Dutch stuff, even on the ground. Need more of both nations’ domestic stuff, and I’d like their Ram IIs.
I’m going to blow a gasket at the claims, all the claims that the leader of the Axis should get unlimited access to Allied Tech through an allied nation do to something younger than the Leo 2. Oh, and incorrect claims about who has the most joint projects with Belgium (it’s likely the UK, from what I’ve seen)
1 Like
You see, there is no contradiction there.
You as a player cant make a report based on that. Devs can.
1 Like