hop in a custom with me i’ll fire a 120B at you lol
Hm…
(im not at home)
gah sorry zizi…
1 Like
Hello @Smin1080p_WT,
Are there any plans to fix and add the Bardelas’s ammo system bug report? the whole point of the vehicle in real life is to testbed the autoloader and the cannon…
1 Like
Yea sure, the ACTUAL su-35 is still missing from the game. No reason it shouldn’t be added, especially since we roughly already know how it will perform. A Su-30SM2 with a MAW and less drag
Not only that, but seeing the recent PL-12 changes, it seems like the Su-35 will be the last and only chance for the Chinese top tier not to stay mediocre
1 Like
not become mediocre? it is already imo what carries them are the Helis and the M1A2T and HQ-11
1 Like
(there are ppl who dont play ground)
for air chinese top tier is mid at best
and for ground there is atleast stuff thats competitive
1 Like
i left out planes because they are so mid so i didnt wanna mention them
Tied worst 13.7 (J-10A is almost as bad as Su-34 atp)
Arguably now worst 14.3 (J-10C)
Worst 14.7 by a MILE (J-15T)
Might even consider J-11B a J-11A sidegrade. You get a better FM but significantly worse missiles.
1 Like
At least there is still a feirce competition for worst 14.3.
i would say that the J-10C is better than the F-16 PoMiD
1 Like
second worst doesnt really make it better
2 Likes
The biggest issue is that if both players are skilled the J-10C is genuinely helpless as the PoBIT can just fly STRAIGHT at it and dodge all of its missiles then kill it uncontested. But against random players perhaps yeah.
I probably, although the gap has cl9sed significantly.
I just wish Gaijin had closed the gap by buffing the PoBIT instead of nerfing China top tier as a whole lol.
The J-10C still has more missiles, a slightly better radar and better sensors.
I would still bet my money on the J-10C if flown by equally skilled players.
1 Like
This is just me guessing but a common complaint about the PL-12 was its abysmal BVR performance.
Sure, most people looked at it pre-changes as a missile with “meh” BVR performance and “well it’s not a MICA/R-77 but it’ll do” WVR performance.
I’m guessing Gaijin wanted to address the lacking BVR performance and they maybe tried to balance out its WVR performance too, same as the changes they did not that long ago with the Derby.
I haven’t played China in a while so I can’t really say from personal experience how bad it is but judging from what I’ve seen from others I think it was a swing and a miss 😬
well it didnt do anything except make it worse overall lmao
2 Likes
In fact, testing indicates that the changes to the PID and the center of gravity have reduced the usable G-load (it fails to execute high G-load even when commanded). Furthermore, it only pulls 18–20G at low altitudes, yet achieves 25G at a slightly longer distance (around 5km) and higher altitude, which somewhat contradicts my understanding of missiles.
This primarily affects the missile’s strike capability at the end of the motor burn phase, the beginning of the glide phase, and at both small and large off-boresight angles. In every sense, it is now more similar to the Derby before its rework or the original PL-5B （This passage uses machine translation, and I don’t understand English very well. Thank you.）
Day 1151 of waiting for Polish tech tree
1 Like
im gonna take this as a chance of making the tank actually worthy of its br so could you please nudge a few reports cause the cheiftain based on yk not player skill is a bit painful right now
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/FJjJrYjXgq2J
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/v4QvwUEgB6pr
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/dTml13NvBZ1X
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/FGRPzxUVcn7Y
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/kBDyXv4H7817
3 Likes