the F35I has way better EW and EA with better sensors and survivability upgrades from Elbit while the greek is just an export version of the F35A so on paper it should be better but like you said, gaijin loves to butcher israeli stuff
1 Like
Well, is there even anything public that states what those Israeli advancements are? No one can claim gaijin is “butchering” something that they themselves can’t find sources for.
1 Like
That will absolutely be butchered, buggy and/or nerfed to the ground
Yeah that’s also not happening knowing them
And neither this xD
Watch the snail make it somehow worse than the base F-35A
Something interesting, SLAM-ER irl has a range of nearly 300km, that should open the door for SCALP/Storm Shadow addition. @Morvran maybe you’d find this interesting
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/P1i5C2pFZXkX
2 Likes
i doubt EW and EA are gonna be like they are IRL, i mean looking at aesa radars they just scan faster and stealth doesnt even work lol
1 Like
That’s the main issue with 5th gen, we won’t even have material to report virtually anything. It’s bad enough right now, will be way worse with 5th gen
3 Likes
SCALP-EG for Rafale? Hell yeah
1 Like
Stealth does actually work iirc, it’s just that the ranges where fights happen are too short. But I remember seeing a video of a F-117 evading ARHs easily without even notching much.
However the AESAs are very nerfed indeed, they should have instant scan
the F35I has a custom DL system for their own anti-air systems and their own jets, has EW suite designed for russian SAM systems used by iran so S300, S400 and so on, has better passive radar detection and has better senors for SEAD and DEAD mission which the normal F35A doesnt have
and true mutli-target locking not just faster scan TWS
1 Like
Taurus wen
1 Like
ooh it could indeed. Taurus too, though of course Gaijin wont add Cruise missiles other than KH-59
1 Like
And then there’s just me who just wants the Grom-1 back.
isnt the GROM-2 better?
If all have the same kind of ability to nuke bases cross map, then yeah. Just unfair when it was 1 nation. Though im desperately coping hoping that the reason ASB has been abandoned the past few years is that we will get a reasonable PvE overhaul alongside ARM that should be next major update, if bases were more like mini versions of the Deep Strike event objective, the long range spam ability of these weapons would be mitigated, but not nuked entirely
Grom 2 has bigger boom, so better for GRB, especially map marker launches (though I guess slower?)
Grom 1 smaller boom but powered, meaning both longer range and easier to use.
Was removed because Su-34s were able to spam them literally from spawning in on the dev server and taking out bases, even a tactic where they would join, fire and leave, the missiles would hit and kill the base and they would still get the rewrad for it. Was genuinely broken
so just a kh38mt, they can still do that so whats the point of removing them
Can a volley of KH-38MTs kill a base? I think it was 4-6? Grom-1s to take out a base
ive seen people do it, paired with a single grom-2 6 kh38mt can kiill a base How to Kh-38 & Grom A Base WarThunder #warthunder
i mean Tornado GR.1 and GR.4 could do the same thing if htey fixed the PGMs range