did you have a nice vacation?
also your lucky theres no major for a while cause once news on it starts you will not hear the end of the challenger 2 from me
did you have a nice vacation?
also your lucky theres no major for a while cause once news on it starts you will not hear the end of the challenger 2 from me
odd I get in straight away but 9/10 games are over halfway done
are you on CIS aswell, cause i tried that and couldnt fly without being lagged into the ground
nope EU and US
50% sales expected this month?
I cant wait for them to replace Air RB with this undercooked mess, so when you DO get into a dogfight (1 in 10 matches) either you or the enemy is killed my SPAA instead of an actual 1 for 1 fight…
nice
Its an issue under investigation currently.
The devs have just been actively working on the nuclear mode, which contains a lot of complexity.
Thanks for the reply. Regarding the Ninth Wave update, I was wondering what the internal stance is on “Brochure Specs.”
We see the Pantsir SM-SV and Kh-38MT (while not combat proven) implemented with their absolute peak advertised performance (40km / 1700ms), while the IRIS-T SLM (which is combat proven) remains limited to roughly 50% of its documented manufacturer range. Is there a specific reason why “Export/Expo Specs” are treated as factual for some nations, while others are held back by more conservative balancing?
Dunno about brochure specs, but we know the Kh-38ML is combat proven and the MT is just the same missile but an IR seeker, so performance wouldn’t be different to begin with
The rest of your question is valid, IMO.
The in game modeling doesn’t match the seeker’s specifications.
Day 1136 of waiting for Polish tech tree
All we need is the IRIS-T SLX,
Said to have a Dual Pulse motor + Dual Seeker with IIR and ARH+GNNS+IOG+DL
That looks like something straight out of PS1 tank game
Is it possible to bring up the other reports for the Tan-SAM Kai again when this one is worked on? There’s quite a few even before the last update.
Missing combined missile loadouts
Missing target lead indication
This one will be helpful once launch without lock is back
Wrong elevation limits
Report was “fixed”, but only to 85° while 90° is known to be possible and seen on other vehicles in game.
Missing 110° ESA search/track modes
- It was being worked on for the dev server, but removed it before release. Would be nice to restart the work on it. I couldn’t find the report but I think there was one.
Missing launch without lock on EO/IR missile
Missing datalink on EO/IR missile
Missing imaging seeker on EO/IR missile
Only relevant if we get imaging mechanics, which is why I haven’t remade the report despite being closed only for a misunderstanding.
There’s probably more missing issues, these are just the ones I could remember and find on the bug report site.
The F-15GE only had a bad launch its kinda the best jet at its br rn, The F-15EX would be even faster and have even more missiles it would fit pretty well in the current iron dome meta.
and slow attackers…
Giving the A10, Su25, A6, A7 and others a closer spawn to the airfield (like mentioned a few years ago now… what happened to that)
Then the ones with all aspect missiles can be moved up in BR as they will now be more effective at their job, just like strike airframes at lower BRs
Always the way, you never know what capabilities they might get in the future and there unique enough to make your account 1 of a kind, and why the event is soo easy, its worth getting both sets of module unlocks while your at it.