Truly a brilliant idea
1 Like
you would think that even after using this “tactic” would keep them alive longer but its just mindless fly straight shoot missiles down i have like 14 of them
This. I’d be much more likely to play Israel if it has low-tier stuff, as I’ve looked at playing Israel but have been turned off by it being post-war-modern only.
Thankfully, use WW2/low tier enjoyers are funnily getting F2P stuff (that doesn’t need you to play WT 24/7 (so TT stuff). But even those limited additions we are being told is more than enough when WW2/low tier is missing full families (even more so when we have WW2 nations with big industries missing a home or a home doesn’t have room)
2 Likes
@Gunjob since you are the only technical mod ik can we get some response from the devs or someone about this
If anything, I think copy-paste low tiers should be skipped entirely hahah
In fact, Israel’s lack of such was one of the main selling points to me.
I also believe China should have been implemented the same way as well. China could very well begin at Rank V and I’m sure most people wouldn’t miss the Russia 2.0 + bit of US/JP copy-paste early Ranks.
But maybe I’m weird, hahahah.
1 Like
Israel’s low tier would only be C&P if Gaijin skips all the unique stuff. As found in the low rank suggestion.
China could also start rank I and be mostly unique if Gaijin made their Frankenstein vehicles, which they have plenty of.
Simply put, both nations could have been added in a way it wasn’t, mostly C&P and not shun a section of the playerbase telling them “they don’t belong playing WT”
1 Like
Its something under longer term plans and considerations yes.
2 Likes
@Smin1080p_WT are there any plans to add more Brazilian vehicles?
EE-T1 Osorio is a good one to start with.
Nothing to speak of right now. Its always possible of course in the future, but that goes for basically most nations.
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT, when are the TM back on the CBR?
Currently its litarally a wasted time to report stuff as litarally no one looks at them
There’s like thousands of reports ._. It’ll take a minute mate
1 Like
I know, around 1300 reports, but maybe 20 at max got acted (which were likely QA or Devs)since the Keefox post which let the TMs Disappear
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT
A question
Are British Phantoms planned to get (somewhere down the line) SuperTEMPs?
There is a report from July last year, was accepted and passed on as suggestion
Its pity since all three British Phantoms lack long range AIM-7F equivalent and SuperTEMP would perfectly fill in that spot
Now there’s a sight: F-16C Iron Doming 🤨🤣
Honestly, the only way to play top tier rn is to play either USA or USSR, spawn Hornet/Su-30SM or Su-30SM2 and cancel out (or pray that they do, sometimes they miss) each other’s missiles and force the merge.
I won’t play that way (or at all, these days), but anyone else can.
There are no current plans for this no. But the suggestion remains open.
1 Like
Well, that’s a shame… All three would benefit from it
Still, thank you for answering
@Smin1080p_WT I recently encountered an issue on the report Black Prince engine incorrect, in that the responding BRM appeared not to know or not be able to respond on which engine the vehicle is equipped with in game;
In the case of the Black Prince, it is well-known that the Bedford Twin Six was used and that the Meteor installation was either only theoretical or never completed.
Any chance we’ll see the naming of drivetrain elements on ground vehicles, where known, in the same manner as aircraft?
Smin, anyway you could forward this?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/sYcwhWf7IOpD
Its using 1 Primary source for each Vehicle
Its possible at some stage yes, however this is a quite major task. But right now there’s nothing to announce on this.
1 Like
Why is it always everyone else vs Germany, Russia and China