The usual, German mains wanting the world,
2 Likes
always them
Polish subtree in the Korea tree take it or leave it
1 Like
yeah sure because turning a tree thats even bigger than the host nation tree into a sub tree makes perfect sense, I just noticed that this didn’t reply to Code after a lot of attempts to send this? Is anyone elses having these issues or is it me?
Well, second comment seeing how I watched my post get deleted seconds after posting.
I mean… have you seen the cockpit? The QA team is too busy denying legit reports. Been trying to get the AH-1G/Tzefas their rocket sights IAW the TM and the literal ballistic chart in the cockpit. Told I haven’t provided enough information on how it should look at work… which I did both AH-1G/Tzefa A/Tzefa B gunsight has no option for rockets // Gaijin.net // Issues
Just to play devil’s advocate here nearly all bombers have cockpit placeholders, the B-52H placeholder is one of the better looking ones we’ve seen at this point.
There’s atleast an attempt made to have it be close to what it should look like, unlike most of the other bombers. The B-17 for example looks nothing like what it should.
I can see why bombers have placeholders given the workload to model them fully but they are making some progress on giving them fully modelled cockpits within each major update.
I am also well aware of the state Gaijin releases aircraft cockpits in.
But the B-52H cockpit is far from the worst thing they’ve done.
1 Like
Fair point, but why are they putting out placeholders on brand new aircrafts…they’re 90% of the way done with the B-52 cockpit. Just spend another month giving it the actual cockpit instead of a half-baked status. The B-52 is also missing the forward-facing radar, the gun radar, a lot of munitions it could carry IRL. It’s painful how much we permit them to give the players products of horrible quality.
Again, they do this with bombers due to the complexity of modelling them completely.
Which wouldn’t have any use in-game as it was a terrain mapping radar.
This is also missing from the B-66 as there were some issues in getting it to work.
It’s not, the version we have is a pre-1991 version from Operation Desert Storm as it still has the tail gun. The only armaments it’s missing is AGM-86C Conventional Air-Launched Cruise Missile, AGM-68B, AGM-69, AGM-129. All but the AGM-86C are nuclear weapons which we will never see outside of a mode like Nuclear Thunder. Those are the only missing weapons for this version of the B-52H that we have in-game, if you want precision guided weapons then you’ll need to wait for a post-1991 variant to be added to the game.
5 Likes
Gaijin could save us all the trouble and just rename this ‘B-52H Early’ which it is.
The ‘Late’ variant would have the smart bombs, cruise missiles, etc.
2 Likes
B-52H “Late” with LITENING-II and
Spoiler
JSOW-A1
Standard Paveways
MOP
JASSM
AGM-142
Standard JDAMs
AGM-84D
SDB-1
Probably missing some but whatever.
Keep the better EGBUs, L-JDAM/ERs, etc for B-52J or something along those lines.
We definitely won’t see the B-52J added to the game. It’s now expected to enter service in 2033 after delays and issues.
Whats next, B-52K?
It’s going to go all to way until B-52Z and then wrap back around to B-52A.
Ngl, that’s just an excuse as they have most of it there. The only thing left is lights indicators modeled and some higher quality graphics.
I honestly can’t find anything about the AN/APQ-166. Does it have the ability to track ground targets or is it strictly terrain? If it’s the latter, Gaijin wasted time by adding it in unless they start doing terrain following/terrain mapping for targeting (which is negated by the map existing for CCRP).
I mean… it was a SRC radar. Unless the target was above the horizon, it isn’t going to work. What would help it more is if the Ai gunners weren’t knee capped to be worse than US ww2 training in capability.
I mean, there’s the AGM-142, a list of CBUs, AGM-86, etc. There’s plenty of options they could have added. Realistically, they should have given us an earlier variant of the B-52 since the game capability hard limits the H
B-52A1 when
Honestly it’s the one of the worst Hornets in game iirc I don’t even know why the yanks wanted 3 the same airframe while being worse then each other
Except Block 1, equipments Operation Enduring Freedom (early-2000’s) and similar to the legacy hornet from USMC
I suppose closer to the USN F/A-18E/F Block III
It would be good if it didnt have to face 13.7 EVERY match, its at best usable currently, wish they gave this one 120 CMs too
1 Like
My two cents?
B-52s cockpit wasn’t fully ready in time for event
I’d give it one or two major updates before it gets fully modeled cockpit