“monitored” as they get clapped by things with better missiles AND better flight performance at the same BR…
nice to know its on the radar, but has it not been on the radar for the past 2 years?
9 Likes
Youre kidding me? You have now several irccm fighter jets at 12.7, vs Mig29s with just 2x R-27ER, and then flare earing R-60Ms. They already had a poor performance looking at their stats.
9 Likes
R60M, Weak RWR, Weak Radar, Weak flight models (in comparison to other 12.7s (mirage 2K, F16A, F15A))
its gonna carry on getting smashed, and now even harder trying to keep up with F16A-15 with aim9M, MAW, and UFO flight performance… all this excluding the up-tiers to 13.0 and beyond
4 Likes
Gaijin is compressing BRs and your guys’ response is asking for more compression through buffs?
Hey. The changes are not intended to currently be live as of right now. Official details will follow tomorrow.
However this is regarding the Falcons radar system. Which is under investigation for implementation.
1 Like
Yes, I know, that’s the usual way it goes.
Thanks!
2 Likes
It has always been. However their performance up to now at 12.7 did not show any indication of it, as it matched their respective BRs.
There is no HEVT for the 30mm, it is a radar system
likely this
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/SXHi6awMTul4
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/SYYKuwQiQf1Q
Not a radar radar, but a lead indicator nontheless
9 Likes
Question: why is the russian mi24 helis are not foldered together? the only difference is the gun and its pain and a waste of time, any planes on that?
1 Like
Are there any plans on reducing the grind in major nation TT? Make a guess.
Did I miss something or an actual number of 0 feedback were acted upon based on the datamines?
Good luck for the nonexisting players of the Commandant Domine (wannabe Aconit, 3.3, directly facing destroyers since day one) for the next 3 months. There is a reason I found zero gameplay videos of that shi*(p)
There were some small changes compared to the original BR changes list, at least for air and ground.
How about AIM-9L for the F-14A and AIM-9M for the F-14B? It’s absurd that the F-15’s with AIM-9M will be the same BR as the F-14A with AIM-9H and is also lower BR than the F-14B with AIM-9L.
1 Like
Still not a sign of RoF improvement for Littorio class ships. That’s sad.
99.99% was ignored, except the F104S.ASA moving to 11.7 (W change btw)
But the Netz moving too 12.3… ehhhh, it was usable at 12.7, but 12.3 its just a better F16A, which is ALREADY broken in a downtier.
2 Likes
I see an opportunity there. One more BR step down and Gaijin will have zero excuses to give F-8P and Lavi.
Simple really, the SU-27 is just better at 13.0, but it can’t move up unless there is more decompression.
I have to ask this, but can anyone tell me how the MiG-29A is equal to the F-15A? R-73s are long overdue IMO now that even more 4th gen aircraft with IRCCM missiles will be at 12.7.
There also needs to be much less reliance on pure statistics because it leads to situations like this. It’s unfun, unbalanced, and not good. Just please give us some reasoning for BR changes beyond “our statistics say…”
8 Likes
But there are worse planes than the F-15A at 13.0, so why just single the F-15s out?
3 Likes