Modifications of the two test radars to production standards for a complete set of 40. It is finalized.
3 Likes
The same is also true of the ECRS Mk I. Changes can occur in any stage, even after production. Nothing is ever “final” in that respect.
and this is why germany chose the MK1 for the time, as we plan to have it show up in service by this year, not by 2028
Still ignoring the main aspect of this conversation, meh i think thats enough for me.
Why are we back with german mains whining for 10° and asking for amk, they should already be happy that they are getting irst, my god…
1 Like
Honestly wouldn’t mind a second AESA Typhoon so long as it’s the P4E kit with the all digital cockpit. But for the the love of god it would be great for Gaijin to folder it on release instead of a few months later.
1 Like
Nothing is being ignored.
Germany selected the ECRS Mk 1 along with Spain.
Britain opted to go with the ECRS Mk 2 along with Italy.
These are the choices that each individual nation has decided.
AMK has not been locked in to only be available to Germany. None of the other consortium members have selected an alternative or ruled it out.
By your own logic, the AMK has also not been delivered yet and could have “changes”. So its not really clear what line you wish to go down here.
2 Likes
Exactly, you still dont see the main aspect on our conversation.
Its not about ECRS MK2 nor AMK kit, its about how Gaijin applies their own policy.
Anyway thanks for the conversation, cheers.
Only Italy profited off brimstone integration
I have seen and answered all of your points. I understand you may not agree with the answers, which is more than fair for you to have your own opinion. But please don’t claim I didn’t see / answer your points.
1 Like
Sure why not, lets say you did see every aspect and tried to answer as good as possible but one thing for sure some of the methods Gaijin is applying on certain aspects are highly questionable.
Anyway thanks for your time and for this conversation.
the point is germany suffer, right?
Wut? Is that even a thing in 2026?
1 Like
I thought Britain suffered since other people can’t get the idea of people wanting homes for their nation instead of being splitted up but also get called Britain mains and claiming the world.
2 Likes
just give me more India or South Africa vehicles🥀
1 Like
No Indian Rafale/Su30 for you.
:trollface:
Spoiler
1 Like
Sorry rendered vehicles doesnt count :D
So if so, why can’t the British get the GBU-48, a 1000lb class GPS+IOG+GNSS GBU in Lieu of their 1000lb E-Paveway II variant?
The Germans and Italians benefit from Paveway IV, which the LJDAMS have the same 500lb GBU placement, and the have the 1000lb GBU-48 too
Germany and Italy both don’t operate Paveway IV IRL.
If Germany and Italy get Paveway IV in game, Likewise why can’t Britain get GBU-48?
yes the british E-Paveway II with such features has been “Suggested”, it still lacks this in game. Why couldn’t it be added as a placeholder until the E-Paveway II is ready or added?
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/IBqSU1PqbUdK
You know what truly suffers?
F/A-18E.
Cant believe Gaijin thinks it should be raised to 14.7 with next BR changes, its outrageous.
2 Likes