Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

I’m not doubting that they would someday add stuff like missile destroyers and carriers, but I don’t think that it’s going to happen anytime soon.

The fact that mechanics are either proven to work through events or implemented in WT Mobile isn’t a guarantee that we will see those mechanics in WT.

Two obvious examples would be UFO and 3DoF zero g environments and flight models we’ve seen in April Fools Events

Another example would be the Lun Class ekranoplan in WT Mobile

1 Like

I mean we are talking about Gaijin here
we have speedboats with the same BR as cruisers, and less than a full BR higher we’re already into capital ships
If we ever get genuine DDGs they’ll likely dump them in the 5.0-6.3 bracket and call it a day

2 Likes

It feels like BR placement is struggling across every Tech Tree right now, not just naval.

The inconsistencies are becoming more noticeable with each update, and it’s starting to affect the overall balance of the game. It might be worth the developers taking a step back and really tightening up the BR system before introducing any more content.

2 Likes

The problem with enlisted is the grind, tons of players complain about it and nothing is being done. That’s why most people switch to games like battlefield.

For chatGPT to help me keep track on my progress for the BP kill task

image

1 Like

@Smin1080p_WT Since the J30 has been a hot topic recently could I ask if we might see the Israelis serviced Mossies soon as that would give Israel some nice CAS at that BR and could provide gaijin to let Israel to go down to rank III at least ?

But yeah it’s just kinda frustrating how we got the RAF, Norsk and now the Swedish one but no sign of the ones fielded by Israel.

image
image

6 Likes

Its the Bedish Swias and Dimitry saying all the Mossies should go to sweden

I hope not, The Mossies were a big help to the Israeli air force and had quite a few of them as pictured above plus as I said in the post above this could give gaijin an option for them to go down to rank III.
Especially with their subs nations being thought about too.

(They also had the radar variant too)
image

More Hawks

1 Like

Definitely not gonna happen soon. J30 has the big nose radar if they add a TT version soon the J30 loses value and the snail would become homeless. Think of the poor snail

huffs copium
100%

1 Like

Well either way it’s also a good excuse for them to also update the Beaufighter too lol

Bristol Beaufighter in Israeli Service - Destination's Journey

Without the radar, it was removed. Some got the AN/APS-4 “ASH” sea radar found on that Norwegian mossie ingame. Good engines tho ofc, 4.0 worthy I bet.

1 Like

Did they still retain the guns ?

Thats hopeful thinking they’ll get their correct engines look at the J30, it doesn’t have its 1650hp engines because snail is lazy

Should be 4x 20mms yeah. Two issue for adding it, one is that the Israelis used the ASH radar as a makeshift air search radar, but ingame when I tried it on the mossie it couldn’t spot anything other than ships, they’d need to change that (fun act, an Israeli B-17 switched out the front turret for that radar). The other issue is the AN/APS-4 required a change to the nosecone to which is was extended in a thin way:
image
It was documented that this caused from with the intakes and cooling, meaning if modeled correctly the engines should overheat a lot more easily.


(Either one without it or before the modification)

Now imo they should add a IAF Mosquito NF Mk.30 and a IAF Mosquito NF MK.30 “ASH” foldered with it, like what they did with the Norwegian mossies.

IMG_8722
(Depiction of how it could be)
IMG_8721

click to show


Until the NF Mk.30 gets added there’s ofc always the FB Mk.VI and the TR Mk.33 which are already ingame:

(Funnily enough, the Mk.33 had its ASH radar removed, as opposed to the Mk.30 having one added lol. De-navalized really)

5 Likes

Any other mossies get the engines on the xix model?

For the Israelis I don’t believe so. For mossies in general I couldn’t say since I’m no mossie nerd, my information is limited to the IAF configurations and their base versions.

Yeah as I say they got a number of them and they would be a fine addition to help them out since they currently lack a heavy fighter and a CAS platform too.

1 Like

We need Rank II-III for ground and air so bad man. So much potential with so many options, yet ground is still limited to a 6.3 reserve vehicle and a 4.3 lowest BR vehicle. They’d be great CAS platforms yeah, if there were lineups to use them for that with… but gaijin be gaijin and we don’t really have any. Actually now that I think about it, I wonder if there’s any technical limitations that’s stopping them from finally doing it, like adding those earlier un-present ranks and removing the reserve status from the Sakeen and base M-51

1 Like