Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

Game Discussion General Discussion
4285

But it also splits available lineups, want to make a modern Aussie or Canadian lineup? Well you can’t because the representation, skins or elsewise, is in two (or three) different trees.

Splitting operators has been discussed many times, and I cant be bothered talking about it too much, but it is the worst option for these nations.

The US should also not be split, the P-51 and Spitfire skins should just be moved over to the US model, and removed from the British one and vice versa, no need to split up any of the TTs in game.

1 Like
4286

saudi tornado gr4 or f3

4287

And there was this reason for the Aussie hornet = The first Australian variant will be the RAAF F/A-18A (Early), which will help to bridge the gap between the Phantom FG.1 and Sea Harrier FA.2.

4288

Well, it could have been the RAAF F/A-18A, making it so the CF-188 and F/A-18A HUG 2.4 were the tech-tree ones.

still would have been a hornet tho.

4289

it only came because Britain mains could not accept not having an American fighter they never even used for some reason, yes

4290

It was mostly commonwealth people asking for them, but OK

3 Likes
4291

Wrong = The first Australian variant will be the RAAF F/A-18A (Early), which will help to bridge the gap between the Phantom FG.1 and Sea Harrier FA.2.

4292

yea i asked they said its some legacy thing

"Because the Mustang Mk 1 was one of the earliest Mustangs in the game. Thus all camos at the time were added to that.

Nothing is off the table. They are just not going to be removed from the Mustang Mk 1"

4293

not really a gap since UK also had 12.3 options

4294

Commonwealth people are still the same as British main unfortunately they can’t tell the difference

4295

would not solve the problem and will be deleted same as the harrier T-10

other getting su30 and f18 premium and you think that gaijin will put a tornado like its gonna sell and make money

4296

elp to bridge the gap BETWEEN the Phantom FG.1 and Sea Harrier FA.2.

4297

Ehh… I will disagree right there.

Tornado F3 (Op Granby) 4x Aim-9M + 4x Skyflash STs + Phimat would be rather fun at 12.3/12.7

Heck, it would be bad, but Sea Harrier FRS51 could probably cope around 12.7

Saudi Tornado F3 for a 12.0

Saudi Tornado GR4 equivalent (can never remember its name) could have been a decent high BR premium strike aircraft (and i would also not say no to a direct equivalent to the WTD61 at some point)

CF-188 was just the easy option

1 Like
4298

to be fair some countries have this already so why should some get treated differently

4299

The only think we lacked in that BR range, was a supersonic dogfighter. We’ve got decent subsonic dogfighters and BVR trucks, but there isnt much in the way of a dogfighter, and that is what the F-18s bodged.

Though the Top tier F-18 was a bit of a waste of time and I would have prefered a few other options

4300

what is the upgrade to the existing AMRAAM SHar?

4301

I have a somewhat relevant meme for this:

Can+AUS WT (flags).png_001
Can+AUS WT (flags).png_001460×1334 228 KB

9 Likes
4302

out of all of them, the F-18? its a bit funny

1 Like
4303

Indian copy of the FA2,

No engine upgrade, no BOL. but magic IIs and Derby instead of AMRAAM and 9M

1 Like
4304

to be fair F/A-18 is buns bro its only semi good trait is lowspeed fights and there are planes that do it better like F2A

1 Like