Lemme guess, none for Germany? Or atleast straight up worse versions compared to whatever version you guys will potentially add to other nations…
Double standards for them accepting a suggeston for the Su-47 but not for the EAP if im not mistaken
Discussions and non-answers regarding the Su-47
oh I was around for that, that conversation still going?
Was for a bit, I wasnt really paying attention
Nope, it moved on.
Hopes for further commonwealth additions and funny cars was what it’s shifted to as of late, or at least the parts I took part in.
1 Like
Yes more funny’s please.
Spoiler
1 Like
@Smin1080p_WT A quick one to answer right 'ere:
Why did the devs decide to give the Su-30MKK the PL-8/12 inly based on some confused photos? We know they don’t have the documents on it nor any other valid sources. Only the MK2 integrated chinese weaponry. At the same time, things like the Q-5L are STILL missing their air to air missiles and let’s not even mention other things like the J-10C engine or JH-7s weaponry.
So, how come there’s premium bias?
ah fair tbh after we got a more modern EFT and Ajax I actually have no wants for new tanks or planes
like I look forward to the new missiles coming out but there isnt anything im desperately looking forward to, maybe a later Ajax with Iron Fist and Javelins but thats still up in the air if its functional
Yeah, new EFT is pretty good. Definetly dealt with one of the major handicaps we’ve been strugglign with for the past year. Just a shame they failed to fix any of the old reports
My most “major” want would probably be a Leo 2A6 CAN and/or (preferably and) Aussie SEPv3 to join the UK so I can make a Canadian and Australian/ANZAC top-tier line-up. Anything else from these nations leans towards a like now.
After that, it’s missing lend-lease and the “funnies” for wants.
PL-8s and PL-12s were reported:
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/ykqPIJqRF66C
https://community.gaijin.net/issues/p/warthunder/i/DaVRgtrFwheb
They can also be seen in photos and videos: https://www.bilibili.com/video/BV19zmGYDErq/?spm_id_from=333.999.0.0&vd_source=a8f6ac869b1a1245942a111891166e85
This was also confirmed with promotional materials at airshows and public events.
This is still under review. The sources are limited: Community Bug Reporting System
The J-10C has the correct engine for its current model. Which is that of the early J-10C batches. As we said, the model needs to be changed to incorporate a later engine. Which is not a quick change.
Suggestions remain open for these.
one thing i’d like to see is improved aircraft damage visuals
you see similar stuff at times, but its really rare, and not so great quality in the end, also rather buggy/glitchy when it does happen
could come as one of the neat changes that happen randomly, like the metal scraping sound and reworked sparks on belly landing, or Volumetric Afterburners, Burning Fuel tank trails, and the ammuniton detonation effects you sometimes see in ground vehicles (the BIG one)
2 Likes
A rename would uhm… Be sensible??
Thank you for the answer.
2 Likes
Nah, clearly marketing lies :P
Quick question for anyone, does the turret cheek next to the gun look flat?
Spoiler
I know it wouldnt be very good and would fill a similar role to the badger (most likely being better then it) but I want the Lav 6
1 Like
you shouldn’t put EAP and F-15SE together since that kind of implies the F-15SE never actually had a real armament
This is very frustrating to read. While I understand it looks like “just play the game bro”, it is quite literally ALL we have to go off of. We don’t know whats causing, but what I can tell you is we know how much an issue it is. We have been scratching our heads as a community for the past few weeks diving in and looking for commonalities but all we seem to find are more variables that throw wrenches in our theories.
Correct me if I am wrong here, but bug reports are just that, reporting a bug. Sometimes we can’t provide an exact list of how to recreate something, we just don’t know what causes it. The most we can do is list out as much info we can, provide literal proof of in game footage, and hope the devs can figure it out. I understand the logs is something I should have added and didn’t think about, but saying a report just “says play the game” is such a frustrating thing for me personally.
We don’t know what we don’t know, and to have literal game breaking bugs get reported and turned down because we just don’t know how to recreate something puts such a bad taste in my mouth.
2 Likes
did the silent eagle mount weapons? all I can find mention of is it having weapon bays and they were meant for AIM-120s and AIM-9s but no mention of if it actually had them