EAP with Supertemp, BK27, and 9M would make one great jet, 13.0 hole filler easily
2 Likes
It would be fun
The post you responded to is agreeing with you, and I’m agreeing with you again.
I appreciate the post I didn’t have the time to include in my own post.
I’ve amended the post to include a bit of that:
Glad to see we’re in agreement.
No, all the above documents are relating to the EAP airframe itself, not some hypothetical future airframe.
4 Likes
Which is what my post is referencing.
I’m literally agreeing with you, and you’re literally agreeing with me.
@Smin1080p_WT sorry for the ping but could you asnwer some things
Any idea when the Gripen E will get its extended wings given the report was passed and maybe if this will change the FM?
2nd is Denmark likely to go anywhere else or is Sweden currently the only place it will go?
That would depend on the outcome of the report.
Sweden is the current home.
1 Like
No, I’m not. You are saying there was no intent to arm EAP, only a hypothetical future plane. This is incorrect. Provisions were made to arm the EAP airframe itself, as it was built and existed.
1 Like
I am saying that there was intent to arm a future EAP, you are saying the same thing.
for clarification, Official subtree,
or
not anything danish planned to break the Denmark → Sweden trend
2 Likes
I think someone feels kinda silly now lol
2 Likes
IDK why they think I’m not talking about a future EAP when I obviously am.
Please explain how that is different from an intent to arm a future SU-47 then. The existing airframe was never armed, it was only (allegedly) planned for a hypothetical future that never materialised.
1 Like
I’m not talking about you but another person : 3
Why would I justify an argument I never made?
Go speak to someone that is making that argument.
Yeah i don’t think we are gonna get an answer to that
Why would I justify an argument I never made?
Go speak to someone that is making that argument.
The issue is there are no documents with intent to arm EAP, only documents to arm a later “EAP” military intended aircraft, similar to F-20A and AIM-120s.
Su-47 has the government contract order.
You imply that there is a difference in the intent to arm some hypothetical EAP and the alleged government contract for the SU-47 right here which warrants the SU-47 being a valid addition and the EAP not being one.
I made no such implication.
All I stated was Su-47 was a government program and it should be compared to other government programs.
I’m not going to get any Su-47, and I didn’t vote on the suggestion to begin with.
1 Like
Guys, neither the Su-47 or EAP have anything to do with this topic. Please take it to a more appropriate place or PM if you want to carry this on. Its been going back and forth all day.
2 Likes
Is Denmark an official subtree?