Hey. The report has been forwarded.
By steps to reproduce, we mean a simple list of actions / steps to take to get the bug to happen. For example:
Steps to reproduce:
Unfortunately just saying in a report to “play the game” is not sufficient or helpful to locate or resolve an issue practically.
As evident from the very hollow A-6E SWIP and tech tree BMD-4 promises (lest we forget about the other more minor things like MAW on J-8F)?
Y’all literally waited for Russia to come out with a new BMD model that’s how bad the devs cornered themselves. And of course you made the tech tree one “worth grinding” by making it the worst of the bunch ( Not the first time the premium “sidegrade” is an upgrade, need I mention a few more examples?)
Did I get that whole thing right?
hello im TheChosenMonolit
We never promised or announced this vehicle at all.
Im not even sure what this is referring too.
Promised the stuff 4 about 10 years ago and still nothing ):
Sadly plans can and do change. Thats why we always make that clear. Everything is subject to change. Nothing is ever 100% and plans are something that are always fluid and changing constantly. Thus is the nature of game development. Its never always linear.
me when I edit stuff ( or rather, articles)
Look at what I said above this quote.
some italian is crying in the corner cause of an ariete with combined war and pso kit
@Smin1080p_WT can you give us a sneakpeak for the next event vehicle?
Doesn’t even have to be anything specific, I’d be happy with just knowing if its a plane, tank or ship
i mean, thats not necesarily the case, like i pointed already out with leo 2dm rework or turret baskets
they just never happen, they dont specialy need to edit old articles
generaly the community at this point has the habbit of saving any promises / statement etc
them editing would reflect very badly, the internet never forgets
Could you please link specifically where we promised the A-6 SWIP? I am not aware of any edited article or post that mentioned this vehicle. Hence why I am curious where this claim comes from.
Its entirely possible we may have said other versions were possible in the future.
We said there would be a tree version of the BMD-4 and there is. Im not really sure what you mean by the rest of your post there other than a personal opinion. But it doesn’t change the fact what we said would come did come.
ehhh, not really true.
They do tend to go back even a week after a devblog just to do the funny.
well yeah, those are very stupid edits, cause of wrong info etc
But not cause of promises or statements
a-6e was a meme vehicle on the list lol
Do you have it? What armament would a “finished” Su-47 include?
That’s what I remember was said, but it’s been a long time since the A-6E was introduced
It’s a bit sad that Gaijin never added any other variant of the A-6 either way
i think its just schizophrenia, the only places i’ve seen it is the Leak Educated guess lists and when it got fowarded to devs from suggestions (I think it was anyway)
Well yeah. Again, a new version of it, the Sinitsa modification, was literally announced early last year which finally gave the devs an excuse to put it into the game ( yadda yadda M2 name but whateva)
Personal opinion though? What, the fact that most current day premiums are straight upgrades over tech tree counterparts? F-4S is truly a sidegrade, trust. As well as the BMPT and the BMD-4M. There’s prolly more I missed but I said what I said.
The SWIP part definitely was induced by the leaks
Thats all that’s ever been said. Hence im curious where this claim of a “promised” A-6 SWIP came from. We have never promised any such vehicle.