Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

[Pheonix_RX01]

Leo 2A5 has a weird Turret basket compared to other Leos rn maybe something to come?

[Deathmisser]

@Surbaissemaxxing It’s over

Sukhoi Su-47 Berkut

poll [image] HISTORY: The sukhoi Su-47 was designed and developed by JSC Sukhoi Company in the early 1990s under the designation Su-37 during initial development. One of the distinguishing feature of the jet is it’s forward-swept wing, wgich gave the aircraft an excellent agility and maneuverability in sub sonic speeds. The design of the wings also gave it the ability to alter it’s angle of attack and flight path very quickly while still retaining maneuverability in supersonic speeds. The i…

[Pheonix_RX01]

Nice

[RowanFW]

Seeing the A-150 get passed is a bit jank too. Seeing as it breaks the unwritten rule that naval additions were at least laid down. Not to mention the 4 F-35’s

[joshje100]

Very happy to see this get passed.

Expanded Voice lines For RIO/WSOs: Better Backseat Driving!

Expanded Voice lines For RIO/WSOs: Better Backseat Driving! [image] (Polls are at the Bottom) 'Ello Folks! Welcome back! I want to suggest an expansion of Voicelines and Callouts that can be said by WSOs, RIOs, etc., in 2-seater aircraft. In real life, Communication between the pilot and WSO is essential in combat missions, as the WSO operates radar, weapon systems, countermeasures, etc, and relaying that information to the pilot is critical. Thus, I want to suggest an expansion in …

Would be a nice addition for sim.

[Deathmisser]

Yeah just seeing the air side just filled with F-35’s just gives it away on what they’re doing really.
Getting rid of those suggestions now because they are going to be added soon

[RowanFW]

Eh, passed to devs means very little in my experience so I’m not too bothered. But this one just looked particularly jank to me.

[joshje100]

If we are getting the Su-47 then it should let us get other tech demonstrators like the EAP and F-15E1 (the SE tech demonstrator) since those are much closer in the current rules of being added to the game.

[dotSHINI]

It is a lot more.
Armor holes, wrongly modelled armoe etc for all variants

[Spitprk]

Smin1080p after another mention of the EAP:

[joshje100]

There’s been talk of it since the Su-47 “guess” for this year. And it’s completely warranted.

[Pheonix_RX01]

I was juat pointing out its a bit different and probably not suppose to be here. Again maybe a hint thag they are lloking at it maybe not

[RowanFW]

Nothing personal against you, but I always find it funny that it’s just the russian “paper” BB’s people complain about.
Stalingrad especially is so bad at 7.7 it’s barely even worth mentioning.

[Cheeki_Breeki5]

I would love a Polish tech tree. Put that in a future update please

[YaSen]

Finally, passed to devs suggestions, it probably means pending suggestions will be reviewed soon as well, I still have one pending since November.

[joshje100]

We had a load approved 2 days ago actually. But nearly all of them were for minesweepers.

But yeah hoping we get some more approved soon. I’ve still got 4 pending, 1 from October, 1 from November, and 2 from early December.

[AWACS_Ghost_Eye1]

Speaking about minesweepers, what about MICLIC armed tanks? I can imagine a low tier MICLIC armed AAVP or BTR-50 being quite fun, or T-55AS with a soviet counterpart

[WaffleStomp0768-live]

US doesn’t need any sub trees, just give me my domestic options.

Spoiler

There are tons more of course, these are my personal favorites.

[Ogaly_Bogaly]

I’ve still got six from September still pending, so the suggestion mods still have tons left to go through.

I do wonder what’s the highest their backlogs ever gotten though, I imagine it must be pretty high.

[WaffleStomp0768-live]

They were quick to deny mine. Took them 2 days?