They need to decompress the hell out of top tier first
2 Likes
Agreed
I really don’t understand why almost none of the top tier AAs have TWS ESA, even though I have seen reports/claims for a lot of the top tier AAs that they have ESA radars irl.
3 Likes
This is also a pretty good reason for the addition of submarines/carriers in the future. They’re other whole tech trees that can be built up over time
1 Like
thing is from what we know of MMW it has a really short range so if they added it with LOBL with mode 2 they would still nead to guide the brimstone till about 5km
also the request for MMW were mostly curbed with the introduction of the SPICE-250 finally giving the EFT some kind of FnF weapon (still think brimstone 2s should be added as they would still be SAL they would just have a longer range then 12km)
Man, I may not really care about submarines, but it’s actually kind of insulting that we are getting infantry before submarines.
I can understand why they are taking their time with carriers though. It’s probably hard to find a way to make them fun to play for both sides.
1 Like
the 2 Bradlees in question
Typhoon when lol
Yep, god damn that would be funny, but alas, its not a soviet weapon, so doesnt fall under the same rules unfortunately
There is a distinction between light vehicles with a gun/ATGM combo and pure ATGM carriers and I believe what @WaffleStomp0768-live here is asking for is a pure ATGM carrier.
You know, stuff like the Swingfire, Khrizantema or Zachlam Tager.
2 Likes
There should be more vehicle types in general.
The light-medium-heavy-TD-AA categories aren’t enough for all the edge cases
2 Likes
yeah but saying there are no tow carriers at all in the US tree is just wrong that was what I was pointing out
1 Like
There are sub-types, ATGM Carrier is one of them.
They also differentiate between SPAA and SAM in-game.
Edit: just checked, apparently they don’t differentiate those ingame, I could have sworn they did at some point tho
The roles just exist to balance spawn costs and to restrict the ability to use artillery anyways, so adding more roles wouldn’t necessarily change anything
Fair
tbh I would argue the ML is more OP then the MT due to being able to fire from the airfield with out even needing airspeed or altitude
Yeah, but that is at least a little niche in its use.
I tried to play a top tier SIM match a few days ago. Our entire team was dead within second between a combo of MI-28NMs and Su-30s.
1 Like
But, but…
3 Likes
Suuuure…
I’ll believe that when I see it, otherwise infantry is just a new vessel to pour resources into that could be used for other more important things
3 Likes
“What do you mean you want new maps for ground, air and naval, we’ve just released 15 new infantry maps, arent those good enough?”
2 Likes
“Look at all these guns we’ve added for infantry!”
(each gun counts as a seperate “vehicle”)
3 Likes
Yeah but, waiting for the launcher to deploy on a 6000 sqft house isn’t exactly what I meant.