Whats the reasoning behind this?
Is there any perticular reason why the same skin cant be found on multiple vehicles.
For example iirc the Hunter FGA9 has a Swiss Hunter skin that I dont think is present on either Swiss Hunter.
Sea Harrier FRS1e has no skins, but the FRS1 has 2 possible skins that could be given to the FRS1e
Typhoons have loads of skin options but the AESA ones dont.
Hopefully the UK one isn’t a CR2 OES
I really just don’t like the OES lmao
long shot ik, but I would go broke if it was a Scimmie lmao
MICA NG is also confirmed to have both way datalinks. Are you aware of any other IR missiles with this capability ? What would be the benefits of such system ?
anything being considered for the hq-11 seeing as it’s sitting in the same boat as the spyder currently?
Marketplace skins provide revenue to the creator also. So generally its not great to duplicate an existing marketplace camo where it can be avoided.
What about non-marketplace skins. Such as GE skins / those that you can acquire for free via actions?
Non market camos are possible. But there are always still considerations to be had.
Regarding the AESA Typhoons, as we already said, these represent aircraft not yet even in operational service. So there are no skins for them apart from 1 airframe each potentially for the UK and Germany (which leaves Italy at a loss).
But we don’t have plans to add them currently, as they are intentionally standard scheme camos.
Sad,
Btw, is the Dev who is Responsible for PlayStation still on Holiday? It seems wierd, like, Trees render in air vehicle only if they are nearly inside you (reports are getting ignored since nearly 3 years)
Skins get blurry when looking in normal angles Accepted since 3 months
Headtracking is still gone entirely…
Accepted since a Month
UHQ Packs also seem to have quit there Job, enjoy 60GB for literally no change
Accepted since a Month
(Funfact, you cant even rate the game anymore in the PSN Store, becauae according to the PSN Store WT isnt anymore there because for some reason it tells you WT isnt aviable)
A UK Senrai Maiden would bankrupt you wow.
Anyway I hope for the UK one she has a bowler hat.
Okay, but what about other aircraft, such as the FRS1e?
At a bare minimum the FRS1’s default skin could be available to give an alternative to the peace-time blue camo
Bruh
Unfortunately not every aircraft can have multiple skins. Right now we don’t plan any extra skins for the FRS1e. Both the E and later life FRS.1 have appropriate skins to represent them.
Except the FRS1e doesnt.
It’s current skin is its peace-time skin prior to the falklands. They were painted on route to the Falklands at the same time they were modified to fit Aim-9Ls.
Either the NAS 809 skin or a grey skin would be the most accurate and apporpiate for the airframe. Its also wierd using a peacetime camo in combat. As it stands the Argentine valor skin should have been given to the FRS1e not the FRS1 which was in the post falklands fit currently. Though imo, needs to be upgraded to the pre-FA2 fit bar weapons
It makes money so yes
Im also not against them for people who wanna grind as they are slightly different looking tanks to their counterparts and offer non anime skins which help them look pretty cool imo.
The skin is of an early FRS.1(e). Exactly what it is.
Its weapon set doesn’t define its skin. Thats a balancing factor. The all-over Grey is already present on the later FRS.1.
Still a shame it has a terrible skin and 0 alternatives in-game. the bright blue makes you stand out like a sore thumb, and thats without the wet bonfire of smoke coming out the back of the airframe.
I missed that part, but it should be able to guide on teammates’ radar data even if you turned away, I don’t think any other IIR missiles have that currently.
figure of speech lmao
I am financially stable.
That’s not two-way datalink as I understand it. Regular MICA has 3rd party targeting feature as well, but doesn’t have 3rd party datalinking the missile itself during its transit.
