Indonesian Rafale B, unlike the Thai Gripen E, is already built, so that could be an option.
2 Likes
Ah, in that case, problem solved
As if CAS wasnt already broken. 12x fire and forget is not what we need. The brimstones are already insanely good if used by someone with actual skill.
Brimstone II exists bud
Brimstone
Brimstone Dual mode
Brimstone II
Brimstone III
Spear III
3 Likes
why would you add the rafale to other nations, they already made that mistake with the gripen, there is no point in making the french tech tree completely useless.
britain will definitely get a rafale eventually. also if you think french tree will become useless, i wonder what you think of israel lol
1 Like
The French tree has F16s and Leopard IIs
wont happen
so does every nation in the game
india has been confirmed to be a subtree like a million times by now
SPEAR 3 has over 100+ km range.
still, adding the rafale & su30 to britain just wouldnt be fun. At that point there is no point in tech trees anymore. Let me play japan to get a gripen and britian to get a rafale. complete joke
lets give Japan a radar SPAA with a range over 16km’s first.
not a issue since we dont have maps that big
2 Likes
So does the kh38 (almost)
problem with spear 3 is that its basically a gbu 39 with an ir and arh seekerhead + gnss. not gonna be fun with like 16 of those on any plane or like 28 on the f -15ex
o.O as premium maybe
IPA with Prototype standard would be 9Li Single rail only and most of the tech in it would be not yet integrated like: HMD, DASS (MAWS) and even the FFS
no AMRAAMs, no Bombs, no twin rack Sidewinders
sounds 12.0 tbh
IR version doesn’t have that kind of range but is also still a concept right now
We’re at a point where existing missiles already have longer range than the seekers so why does it matter what the missiles theoretical max range is when it limited by the seeker and lock range? As long as LOAL or MITL does not exist why does it matter?