i think you are confusing with mechanical radar , both AESA and PESA radars use electronic beam steering , however AESA radars have separate transistor and receiver modules vs PESA radar only has one for all , as a result AESA radar is better and faster than PESA radar (but both are significantly better than mechanical radar) AESA radar’s main advantage is that it can work in different frequencies simultaneously vs PESA using the same on all. (aesa radar will have a big advantage in jamming).
Yes, we answered this in the Python 4 / Sufa topic last major update:
“Python 4 is a matter of game balance consideration. Right now, no other equivalent exists besides RVV-MD. Meaning only 2-3 nations at most could receive a missile of this kind. After that, its only the more advanced generation of missiles that would come to all nations. So it is not planned for this major update on the F-16I currently.”
3 Likes
still doesnt really tell us what part of the missile is too good but, good enough i guess
Suggestions are open for them on the aircraft above.
Afraid I don’t have an answer for every possible bomb / ordinance possible to suggest across the game, as there is a great deal.
Hey Smin, do you know when the dev plan to fix british tanks missing their biscuits? How are the crews supposed to drink their tea if there’s no biscuits?
to be honest id like more technical explanations if it comes to what is and isnt added. theres no need to keep it simplified
Because rvvmd and python 4 have really good irccm and insane range and close range ability. It’s not balanced.
The both have dual band seekerheads with good off bore ability and long range touching.
that doesnt improve a lot on what was already said
It looks like you clearly ignore me every time.
Because I’m just generally speaking about what aircraft at the BR of 11.0-11.3 the Hawk would be around. When I mentioned the F-5’s I didn’t go into the differences between the F-5E FCU, F-5T SCU or the F-5A(G) because there wasn’t a need to be talking about the individual differences, similarly when mentioned the Viggens. The point was about what supersonic aircraft with all-aspect missiles the Hawk would be around given the main point of contention with the Hawk’s BR is it’s access to AIM-9L or AIM-9P and that it’s subsonic.
Obviously the strike Viggens perform worse than the C Viggen no one said it was better. The whole point was that the Hawk could work at the BR of 11.0 → 11.3 given the numerous aircraft that are much faster and also have all aspect missiles at those same BR’s.
No biscuits POV =)
4 Likes
or maybe its because the general question of “is x leaked vehicle being added” has been answered hundreds of times by now
they cannot, and will not, comment on leaks
1 Like
Unfortunately I get a lot of pings all the time and cant catch them all.
If / when we have any new vehicle to announce, we will. As you would know, we don’t make announcements in this topic or outside the CM updates, Streams, Blogs or official news.
Regarding “leaks”, rumours and speculation, as we have said many times, we don’t comment on this.
2 Likes
You mentioned a few days ago
None the less, the desire to see one for Germany is very much known. Just sadly as i said, its not in any immediate plans. Which are focused on other vehicles heavily requested for Germany.
and then specified that its about aircraft.
Was this related to this update or in general?
1 Like
How about the VT-4 from last update? It isn’t leaks it was planned 100%.
A VT-4 was not coming last major:
Can i ask about a specifc thing 🇩🇰, also is the halloween stuff next week?
to be honest i am fairly curious to see the absolute hell this place will become if china for whatever reason does get the M1A2T.
because the double standards would be so obvious ray charles would be able to see it
1 Like
And i Guess that neither Is the M1A2T coming this update since It wasn’t under the next Major update section in the community post
1 Like
The range is 15 km max btw
Thats not that that not extreme at all
The rvv md has 30 km or more