now you can be full afterburner and just pop one flare…
1 Like
Yeah… an IR overhaul is seriously overdue
4 Likes
i heard enough.
nerf the merkavas, uptier the namers, and add 20 more magachs to the tech tree
3 Likes
its so overdue it grew mold already
1 Like
2 Likes
did we ever figure out if the GBU-62s could be mounted on the double racks to be able to carry more then 6?
The only one which cant be filled by unique swiss tanks now is the light tank gap with a pt-76b.
For everything else you can simply add swiss Panzer XX instead of T-54s or T-55s
and i call that CGM “Classic Gaijin Move”
Yes, because export doesn’t allow the DU, so they use the tungsten version… every abrams can use it.
I think so… but whether Gaijin will make that change… is another question entirely.
Especially as I dont think there is any evidence the Typhoon ever used GBU-62s, I think they are a bodge addition as a placeholder for our actual A2G loadout.
I wonder what BTR-82AT version we’re getting:
The BTR-82AT featuring either a BPPU Combat Module (production model) or the BTR-BM Combat Module (prototype model).
1 Like
yeah the efts are a mess with their loadouts im sure its only gonna get better with introduction of 5th gen IIR missiles (wonder if they can use 9X idk why you ever would tho)
ASRAAM and IRIS-T remain inter-compatible with Aim-9. So it probably wouldnt take much to intergrate them (and unlike the US, it wouldnt take 15 years) but yeah, no idea why you would use such a downgrade weapon
lol yeah I assume the peak loadouts gonna be 4 ASRAAMs 2 IRIS-T and 4 AIM120-C5s (for A2A anyway)
It would be probably, but Im doubting whether we will get the ability to take both (and quite frankly, I dont think they should, its a good way to create some differences between the Typhoons, they already removed some of the uniqueness by giving everyone the same A2G, well nearly the same)
at this point with how gaijin is treating the EFTs loadouts best we stick together so we at least get something otherwise knowing gaijin one of them will just end up worse
If this comes with out the LAV for the UK and USA im going to be very confused. The LAV has been modeled in the files for 3 years now i believe and still no lav yet.
Its frustrating to see tons of nations having 4x4 auto cannon wielding tanks but the US has yet to get their plethora of light tanks they make. Canada would also be cool to see along with the ASLAV.
No idea where you heard that. It’s just not true. Gszabi99 has a list of all datamined and leaked vehicles here > https://gszabi99.github.io/ (And remember MWF isn’t WT)
https://youtu.be/LiU9zIE_g7E?si=rwgLW_yyIOZyDwAT - its modeled here 8 months ago
desert warrior
lAV AD
Same delco turret
Its in game, just in pieces…
5 Likes
I think it could still sit at a relatively low BR whilst also having 9L’s. Having a look at other stuff in the region of 11.0-11.3 you have:
- 3 F-5’s with 9L’s (also Python 3)
- 2 Viggens (one with 9L’s and one with Skyflash)
- 5 MiG-21’s with R-60M’s
- 3 MiG-23’s with R-60M’s
Which are all supersonic fighters.
There are also:
- 6 Su-22/17’s with R-60M’s
- 3 Tornado’s with 9L’s
- 2 MiG-27’s with R-60M’s
- Su-24M with R=60M’s
Which are all also supersonic. Granted these are attackers but they can still easily engage subsonic aircraft by chasing them down or just keeping their speed up and lobbing their missiles.
Granted none of those have both IR + SARH missiles but given that the Hawk is subsonic I think it could very easily fit at 11.3 maybe even 11.0 with 9L and Skyflash since having to go up against targets like those.
(Also not to mention stuff like the J-7E and lower F-5’s which are menaces at that BR due to how well they can dogfight).