X-4 left the chat
This is about unguided rockets. I’m using a translator, and in my language, a rocket means anything with a rocket engine (guided and unguided rockets, missiles).
Aw man (give it X-4 anyway)
Hello
Captured / leased aircraft dont always have 1:1 the same loadouts as their standard production counterparts. This has been the case on more than just the 3 aircraft you noted.
There is an internal suggestion report open that covers each vehicle in game that has differing loadouts, but ultimately this remains down to the discretion of the developers. So there is no ETA possible for me to provide.
5 Likes
I mean I think unlike in ground and air naval actually will be more fun in a modern setting, Subs for example are harder to detect and would have more countermeasures like later nato subs with MOSS or Noise Makers, they would also have wire guided torpedoes and even later ones with SML-ASM
meanwhile you would have more cold war ear destroyers and frigates with things like ASROC or RBU-6000s their own noise makers and even towed sonar decoys
I apologize for misleading you. I wasn’t referring to missiles (X-4), but rather unguided rockets.
2 Likes
Gaijin gibbing the Impala II at this point would prob be more fun then the Hawk 200 as no 25mm plus radar sadge.
Wonder if we will ever get more east german tanks, sure yes majority copypaste, but one that could fill holes
Also could go full funi and add
xD. Specifically designed for Hawks!
Though, I fear gaijin would “wasnt actually on hawk 200” it.
Honestly I’d quite like the Sea Eagles (for Sim) but especially the BAT120 mini-bombs
You’d have to nail stuff on foreheads, but for CAS in airmodes it would be quite fun.
(they come in bundles on 6 or 9, so you can bring loads of them)
The Hawk 200 also have maverick compatibility which is nice
only concern is what BR would it be in GRB if its above 11.0 its pretty DOA for GRB but with ARH missiles and mavrics I dont see it being lower then 11.0
Hang on…
Spear-3 cant be added with GNSS or GNSS+SAL because it also has MMW and they cant just remove a guidance mode from it
But JAGM-MR and Brimstone 1 are both MMW+SAL (and Im on the fence whether the NIR used on the JAGM-MR is actually usable in the manner that is depicted in game, but im not splitting hairs on that aspect) but are fine to be added without thier primary guidance of MMW?
Whats the difference?
Just don’t give it ARH?
It can take normal Skyflashes
the bigger problem would be the IRs as it’s 9Ms or 9Ls on the demonstrators, but they operate 9Ps in foreign use so just do a 9P + Skyflash loadout for air, and it’s limited to 2 mavs similar to the AS37 which is 10.3. The A-10A early gets what 6? mavs at 10.3 so thats not to wild.
I’d go 10.7 GRB
11.0 ARB
10.7-11.3 ASB, it’s got a good radar (APG-66H, a cut down F-16 radar) and RWR (Sky-guardian 200), would depend on how the limited weapons and speed effect its well effectiveness)
with that loadout I would say it could get 9Ls for 10.3 if its only got rear aspect missiles is sub sonic and only carries 2 mavs it could easily be 10.0 in grb
Id hope for 9Ls at 11.0 and not Aim-9Ps given the subsonic nature (and possibly no gun with radar? at least without the added drag of an external 30mm ADEN?)
considering there are jets with 9Ls at 10.3 in ARB
What about limiting the amount of spears for gameplay purposes. The spear 3’s are way worse than the kh-38’s since the kh-38 is way faster and does way more damage. Range is not even a factor since most ground maps are under 20 km’s. If 12 spears would be too many maybe limit them to 8 or 6 for balancing reasons. But flat out denying any FnF weapons for the Eurofighter is just unfair and frankly, biased.
there is a jet*
i guess tomorrow for the Hawk
IF not going with ARH then why not just go for the SAAF hawk 120 or something, oh well.