X vehicles do not come instead of fixing bugs. They are not related at all. They are being added to provide gameplay that those vehicles themselves do not provide. No matter what report is fixed on Challenger, it remains a Challenger. The purpose of these sub trees is to diversify gameplay options, nothing about sidestepping reports as you are trying to spin it as.
On the one hand you are complaining about foreign tanks from the commonwealth being added to the British tree, the next second you are asking for Leopards. Its a bit of a strange dual take.
I look forward to being proved wrong in that case.
But when things like the Stormer HVM really needs TLC but Strela and OSA are added instead… Its hard not to draw conclusions.
I am not asking for a Leo 2. But rather pointing out the opposite handling of the situation.
Leo 2s were added instead of fixing Leclercs, Arietes and now by the looks of things the Merkavas. Abrams probably will eb added instead of fixing top tier chinese tanks.
Gaijins default is to bodge trees with C&Ps instead of spending the time needed to fix existing vehicles.
We’ve just seen this again with an Australian F-18 instead of Tornado F3 buffs
So Chally 2s still not fixed but also no C&P is a wierd situation to be in currently
NGL from my perspective it feels as if developers should’ve thought about it way more before adding Israel, knowing it would all be Pattons and Merkavas. Now they’re butchering smaller nations and doing Frankestein magic because they didn’t seem to think about the future…
These were added directly because people here asked for them. You yourself saw those feedback topics and requests, so the conclusions can be drawn quite clearly. It has nothing to do with any outstanding Stormer reports. But direct community feedback.
This is incorrect.
Also incorrect.
Again, this is an incorrect conclusion. These vehicles are added to increase the gameplay variety and vehicle choices these trees offer. No amount of fixed reports will do that. These vehicles do not come at the expense of or instead of fixed reports. Entirely different teams responsible handle content creation to some of the code fixes or historical you are referring too.
Put short, the connection you are making does not exist.
Tornado F.3 had about a year of continuous fixes and improvements.
The Commonwealth Hornets again were directly requested by your fellow community members.
Im not sure how on earth you came to the conclusion they came “instead of” more fixes to the Tornado F.3.
But unfortunately it seems you have come to your own pre-set conclusions.
As we have said about 3 times now over the last few days, its possible more nations may get new SPAAs too. The Chinese was simply the first one we are able to speak about.
