Again, both Greece and Cyprus operate unique variants of vehicles that don’t already feature.
It seems you have a very loose definition of “copy paste” if you define any variant of something as such.
5 Likes
At this time, we are not going to go into possible vehicles. As someone will remove this from its context and use it as “OMG Smin confirmed X”.
This is about a future planned additon, not something coming now.
People are free to check for themselves what both nations operate.
4 Likes
We do not officially announce something unless its
A) A dev blog
B) CM update
C) Stream / trailer
4 Likes
Will naval players be able to opt out of the new damage control system and manually queue their repairs?
Have you even seen the “new” additions in the game for the last few years? they have alwayse been mostly copy and paste. Gaijin has been going all in on bloating the game, especially top tier, as cheaply as possible…
Fair reaction, I’ll be looking forward to seeing those additions hopefully in a near future :)
ps: personally hope to see the AA branch expanded, israel has a whole lot of gaps between 9.3-12.0
You can leave it as the default setup yes.
2 Likes
I hope adding these two subs to Israel will let them finally have rank 1 to 3
1 Like
Able to reveal what the planned BR is for the New Mossie?
With obvious disclaimer that nothing is set in stone and could change at any point in the coming weeks
Far too soon.
You mean Stan : P
1 Like
Forgive me for going further, but while I may see the first point as valid (with the sacrifice of gameplay variety consisting of Leopards and AMX-30s) I’m unable to understand how there weren’t any other better choices to choose from.
Geographical factors seem to be a stretch from my perspective, it’s like adding a Philippine subtree to Japan simply because they’re in Asia and share similar alliances, while they’re entirely different countries that you could argue don’t share much cultural connection (with Greece and Israel being more extreme).
Wouldn’t there have been any other better choice instead of ruining the potential of a possible Greco-Iberian TT with such a bizarre decision (from my POV)?
-___-
Spoiler
3 Likes
I think it’s best we don’t fight against Greece Leopards for Israel and instead think about how to maximize this absurdity and push for Leopard 2s in the remaining tech trees.
2 Likes
leopard 2 for china, russia and us please, thank you
1 Like
This follows much of the same reasonings we have already done with BeNeLux, Switzerland, Finland and others being based mostly on Geographical situations and gameplay needs. So nothing is really new here.
The key focus being the gameplay point and a nation that can be added to offer things Israel on its own cannot.
it is wierd they were so against a Canadian Leo 2.
I guess they have T-90s planned instead for Britain instead of fixing the Chally 2
3 Likes
The year is 2026. Everybody and his mother has got a Leopard 2. Rheinmetall has achieved monopoly over top tier and profits are skyrocketting. There is no end in sight.
3 Likes
Even if they do eventually add T-90s, we could come back to the topic of Canadian Leo 2s again I suppose.
Only nation i can’t fit a leopard into is ironically the US all others can get them relatively easily