Mounted
can u post the brochure ? i was only able to find this info abt it (i think this variant is used on ships)
if you are confused where is the seeker, Im pretty sure that white covering dome is just to break the seal and then falls off
Still waiting for image of mounted one, needed in order to be added to the game.
Also mockups.
No, what he’s saying is that the 9M100 was never seen on land based launchers, not even in UKR or on Airbases, only on ships.
So it’s possible it hasn’t been integrated on the land platform.
the will be inside the canister, how will i show you a mounted image of one
im mainly taking about the 9M96, 40-60 km of range for a target which isn’t notching,
if one is actively turning and notching i think the range is about 20-30 km,
Wasn’t needed for the mt
Please gajingles, give us a naval blog or a new spitfire variant
1 Like
ahk my bad mate
Eh. Only thing different between the ML and MT is the seeker and plenty of proof the ML can be used
I also hope that the monstrous survivability of the carousel in Soviet/Russian/Chinese tanks will go away in the next update.
Absolutely groundless survivability pisses me off every time. It is a crime to make such a non-viable tank in terms of crew as the T-72(90)/T-80 so survivable.
When producing any tank, you make a compromise. In the case of the T-72 and subsequent ones, in exchange for mass production and cheapness, the compromise is the complete lack of survivability of the crew and participation in the USSR/RF space program.
Yea, cool. But that is a render for DCS, isnt it? What we need is a REAL picture.
Coastal boat blog, calling it
1 Like
all im trying to say is that germany, france and italy will have a huge edge over ussr if the ussr ends up with the Buk-m3, the S-350 with only the 9M96 will be more balanced
it is a render, i can not find an actual photo of the 9m100 being used. But it could give an idea of what to look for?
Well, you are looking for a shorter, quad packed instead of singular canister. That was known.