Spanish avenger posted something
Quick, point and laugh!
A vehicle Smin really loves and would love to see in the game xD
More seriously, it’s something that has been asked for so often in the past that now it gives PTSD to Smin whenever someone mentions it
1 Like
Welcome to German Case, we have the same line which also include Demonstrator, and yet Leopard 2 PSO is in the Production line…
How about the Leopard 2 PSO?
It would make an perfect ending for our NVA/Export/Demonstrator/Prototyp line
Eh?
lets see if we’re gonna be eating good for the next few updates then
In b4 x nation suffers in either the next patch or the coming patches
Better than the American tree where the production MBTs turn into prototypes and the prototypes turn into production MBTs.
Tbf, do we have for the US tree also such an official comment that the lines are clearly planned?
No I don’t think so, but there is… was… a very clear distinction between the production MBT line and the heavy/prototype line. Which they abandoned for some reason.
Hoping for Lion to be perfectly honest, though she’d only be justified at 8.3.
1 Like
Monkey’s paw curls
HMS Lion (1910) to be added at 8.3
2 Likes
Yeah, Lion would be interesting too.
Though being brutally honest, wouldnt say no to some interesting smaller class additions for an update or 2. Like a new cruiser and a cold-war era destroyer
A good cruiser would be appreciated.
But it would have to be one of the laid down ones.
Should AAM-4B be the next missile addition? We recently got R-77-1 and AIM-120C. It seems logical that on the performance progression for advancement in missile technology, AAM-4B is the next step. While it does feature an AESA seeker and features more range than currently modeled AAM-4, it is limited in only 4 missiles being carried. F-2A also can go up in BR when it receives this missile.
Should AAM-4B be the next missile addition?
- Yes
- No (explain why)
0
voters
Also, if you think that AAM-4B shouldn’t be the next missile addition, then what should be the next missile addition?
they should ungimp the AAM-4 and Pl-12 instead
the AAM-4B is the same as the AAM-4 with the only difference being the seeker as far as i know
3 Likes
I did see the report stating AAM-4 should be moreso on par with AAM-4B in terms of range yes. They can still ungimp the AAM-4, but does that mean AAM-4B shouldn’t be the next missile in terms of progression? If not the AAM-4B then what should it be?
There is always something like HMS Fiji or HMCS Ontario and im sure there are more than just those 2.
HMS Dragon.
As the first vehicle for the new Polish tree.
Not really copy and paste most aircraft are built for specific purposes