I’m not exactly sure if anyone has already asked this, but I’ll try nonetheless.
Is this reorganization of the UK tech tree a rather one off and specifically needed change or could we see this sort of treatment to other tech trees?
I would have one particular example that could need some reorganization, particularly if future content is considered.
We don’t “move” tanks from one tree to another. That specific version owned by people already will always remain where it is. No matter what.
The Challenger 2E is still a Challenger and is a logical progression up from the existing Challenger family. It helps to cap that line off, building on what came before it. The export and Commonwealth line serves a different purpose and different style.
There are no plans to move the 2E.
3 Likes
Right now, its just for the UK tree. As its key for the future development of the tree. How it was configured before wouldnt allow for the plans already made.
2 Likes
Got it, thank you.
well that is not completely true, when you decided to add Israel many ground vehicles were removed from US/UK and re added them to the israeli tech tree… you might not call it a “move” but its essentially that, it stops being available in one nation (in this case US), and start being available in another nation (Israel)
But seeing that AIM isn’t an event vehicle like kv-1b can it be duplicated in two trees like recent french and german CLOVIS/df-105?
1 Like
What I said was entirely correct. Nobody who owned those vehicles in the US tree lost them. They all remain in the ownership of those that have them. We did not “move” them as they were.
New separate versions were added to the Israeli tree when it came.
5 Likes
So you’re telling me that the challenger 2E being an export tank but still a challenger means it won’t be going to the export tree, and there’s no point in comparing other tree’s because they’re all unique… so why is there such a lack of consistency? The logical end to the Challenger family is either the Black Knight with it’s APS - plus moving it would help to de-clutter that line - it ends with 2 folders… 2 FOLDERS
Got it, appreciated
the m1a1 HC would like to know your location
Thats correct yes. Its a Challenger development in the Challenger line.
Thats also correct, you are creating rules between two different trees that don’t exist.
Because they are entirely different trees. You are trying to define a rule that does not exist. Again, this line focuses on Export and Commonwealth vehicles. It does not mean ALL export vehicles for the entire tree must fall into that line.
Once again, there are no plans to move the Challenger 2E. It has its rightful place in the Challenger line. There are other future plans for the Export and Commonwealth line, as well as the British tree as a whole that were the primary reason for these changes.
2 Likes
So will the end of the challenger line eventually get decluttered? It looks like an absolute mess at the moment - you have the challenger 3 prototype before the APS chally and the chally with a good engine…
Current?!
Vehicles don’t always go on chronological order, but technology level development. So the Challenger 3 (TD) is very unlikely to ever end up after the Black Night or 2E.
Don’t get your cope hopes up.
Can’t wait to see said plans!! Got me all excited about possibilities
1 Like
thx for clarifying.
The opposite really. I hope he remains adamant.^^
Smin confirming everyones favourite CUM-BLAST tank coming confirmed!!!111one!!1!
(sarcasm/joke btw)
Honestly dont get why people are arguing it, the differences for the 2E are very tiny and its fine living with the rest of its herd.
What’s eap?