7 Likes
That is pretty much exactly what we we’re saying
1 Like
if an export j10C can use it theres nothing stopping the domestic version, also ( in no way shape or form is a j-16 worse then the su30, j16 has either a galium arsenide or galium nitride aesa radar with 1800-200t/r, su30 has a bars pesa later ones have irbis-e which is still outmatched by the j16s radar.pl15 beats any air to air missiles the su30 can fire . r37m isnt designed to target manuverbale planes,r77m was only seen on a su35 and su57m, the R77-1 isnt even an option if your gonna fight a j16 with 8 pl15s,cas yes su30 is better but j16 still has kd88 and many domestic guided bombs which would be fine,and by the time j16 is in game pl10 and next gen ir missiles would already, ingame
you completly forgot how easy it is to notch a missile in WT that was fired from more than 20km away
cas is meh becuase china irl dosent rely on jets for close air support rather focusing on anti shipping, long range standoff attacks and air superiority. china uses its helis for cas
warthunder isnt irl, the game has quite allot of unrealistic aspects
yes and you completly forgot that and went onto saying how long range BVR missiles are way better, which they wont in the context of war thunder
Warthunder ≠ real life
We’re not getting the PL-15 in game for a long time
They both have their strengths and weaknesses
And there are no specs available for the J-16’s radar bar the fact that the first gen used gallium arsenide and has ~1760T/R count. ← this is also basically a rumor with no confirmation
You’re claiming loads of things with nothing to back any of it up bar from rumors
The SU-30 and rafale in WT will spank the J-16 in medium to WVR combat due to the much faster TVC missiles and with superior maneuverability.
You can’t balance a jet with missiles not in game and not coming for a long time either
Why not add an F-16D like they did for Israel, instead of adding it to the US ADF which is less suited for AMRAAM use than the Chinese one?
1 Like
Kinda unfortunate imo, i liked the F16ADF where it was at
2 Likes
Does that mean Chinese F-16 gets its missing CMs back and the US and Italian ADF gets AN/APG(V)2 so they get TWS capability.
1 Like
That is what we meant, yes.
1 Like
guys, how many percent is the fact that the F-16I will be added?
1 Like
11 Likes
We are vampires here, leave with that heresy
2 Likes
thats not even cope thats clinically insane
Yeah there was really no need to change it
i must be blind then cuz:
- the F-4F (Peace Rheine) and F-4F ICE are 2 completly different birds (thats like saying the Tornado IDS and ADV are the same…)
- I only count 2 different F-14A variants, none have All Aspect Fox 2’s
- there is only one F-14B… stuck with 9 Limas (which are, at that BR, in 2025, useless)…
am i overlooking something?
Give the 9 Limas to the F-14A and F-4F and move them up by 0.3
same goes for the 14B. Give it 9 Mikes and move it up.
it cant be this hard… all we want are historical loadouts in the game that advertises itself historical accuracy and realism.
edit: then there is still the fact that the AN/AWG-9 is still gimped, uses the wrong ACM (9km ingame vs 9nm irl) ranges, etc. i have brought this to your attention months ago. still no changes. i get that the F-14 is no longer the shiny new toy and will prob not make any money for the game, but could we get this fixed this already?
3 Likes
Only 0.3? Sure lmao.
Why would the F-4F with AIM-9L only be 11.3 while the Kurnass 2000 is 12.3 in ARB?
because the kurnass has Python3s and 6 of them?
1 Like