Question is will Gaijin make Britain a SAM with CAMM or will they copy paste a weaker version of the BUK…
1 Like
We are not near that stage currently where we have run out of things to add. So there is nothing to talk about right now :)
4 Likes
Ukrainian players don’t buy Type 90 they will never add your tank because it will anger the main Russian players especially if it is better. Why does China have a special status to ban its own equipment, while the US, Russia and Germany are losing their planes and tanks? P.s. I wonder if the Stingray (I hope this is the top version with dynamic armor) for the US will be regimental, regular or premium.
But you are with nations as you tease we could see more but yet more and more subs are being added each year
If the EE Lightning can be 9.3 I don’t see why the Six can’t be.
The Dart is better than the Lightning in basically every way. Only thing keeping it down is that the missiles seem worse than 9E for some reason; that might just be because I can’t test them side-by-side so it only feels that way.
I’m glad Gaijin didn’t chicken out of adding a Chinese vehicle to Japan
Can someone logically explain to me why a vehicle operated by Thailand can’t be in the Thailand ground subtree?
It can’t be done. The gymnastics of some commenters here is hilarious considering that several Japanese vehicles are in the Chinese tree
5 Likes
With there plans for the addition of a Thailand sub tech tree next update and with the eventual addition of the VT-4 for Japan through Thailand in the future and the remodelling of the autoloader and other electronics/damage models for Chinese vehicles this coming update, could we expect the addition of spall liners for all vehicles in the Chinese TT which historically had them (mainly MBTs) this upcoming update?
China as a TT has been struggling to keep up with things like the Pantsir, Leopard 2A7V and SU-30/Eurofighter and has effectively had the same exact top tier vehicle for more than 3 years now (that being the ZTZ99A) - the addition of spall liners would help bridge this large gap.
- Related bug report - Community Bug Reporting System
5 Likes
Sr71? Mig 25 or 31?
Literally nobody is saying it’s impossible. Currently CMs are saying it won’t be in this update, that doesn’t mean it can’t happen in the future.
Critical thinking and reading comprehension go a long way.
Then you clearly haven’t been reading either. Practice what you preach.
Several players here and Reddit are upset about it because of Chinese victory holidays over Japan in August and September. I really don’t understand why Gaijin, a company in Hungary, has to listen to them
There is a very clear difference between China having vehicles it captured and sometimes even used, and a sub-tree handout that was entirely developers discretion. I am surprised you people do not realize this yet.
People’s concerns are valid. Especially considering time frame.
Personally I was not against VT-4, before, and still I am not now. But if developers really intended for it to arrive this update originally, in September. It would sour things out even for me a bit.
4 Likes
People’s concerns are valid, but why only Chinese players?
Why don’t I see people getting upset about the F-18 being added to Germany this summer when the US and Germany were enemies in WW2?? And guess what? The F-18 was teased for Switzerland (Germany) this summer, only a MONTH after Victory in Europe Day!
14 Likes
Show me the quote where an official source says that Japan/Thailand will “never” get the VT4-- which is what your statement was claiming.
This has nothing to do with whether Japan gets a VT4. Plenty of other “unfortunate” timings exist for vehicle releases in War Thunder. But you’re acting like Gaijin is doing this specifically to target China? It’s not like China won’t get any vehicles in the next update, all nations will.
EDIT: yeah I do need to be better @Noveos_Republic , we’re on the same side of the debate lol
1 Like
You are either clueless or intentionally dancing around the point…
2 Likes
So, what was supposed to be controversial? Because nothing in blog even seemed remotely as such.
So either Gzabi was rage baiting or they just didn’t talk about whatever it was supposed to be.
You don’t understand what I mean. I’m sorry if I’m being crass, but it annoys me that Gaijin is potentially more willing to kowtow to Chinese sentiments and “unfortunate timings” than other nations. Best way to avoid it is for Gaijin to not listen to anyone and just implement vehicles
2 Likes
He was correct, clearly
1 Like