The SPAA hole isnt anything new, thats a problem on so many nations its not worth mentioning, now if the Bosvark was a bad spaa like the skink (Referring to its poor velocity at 5.3) then yes id say they need a 5.x spaa but again thats not a new and exclusive problem to britain.
Additionally the argument that SA wasn’t what Britain needed applies to most other nations given gaijins implementation. Im still a firm supporter of Finlands removal and that Norway would be the better TT filler but if its handled the same way Finland is then it just becomes the new Slopland. So again moot argument.
Realistically most problems come from gaijin actively choosing vehicles a nation doesn’t need and calling it a day and forgetting about that nation.
I wanted a good SPAA for 5.x sweden, what i got was a slow unarmored 2 crew SPAA at 5.3 when Finland could’ve offered a far better option, now the USH is left unused because any plane can sit outside its range and fire some 7.62 rounds from 2km out and kill you.
Again most subtree additions are handled so poorly by gaijin it makes me wonder if they purposely do it so they can later sell the needed vehicles as a premium.
Britain always has a priority with you sweetheart. ♥
Britain also has the second most light tanks/ifv’s of all TT’s with Sweden being number 1, so that IFV thingy must tone down a bit - everybody lacks IFV’s and light tanks.
Yeah, oke, maybe GB needs a SPAA at 6.3, 7.7 and 12.0, but thats really it IMHO.
One of these days. Maybe we’ll get the Challenger 2 overhaul we were promised, but its more likely we’ll get a Soviet C&P instead. Like they did with the Stormer HVM
