yeah, for top tier.
But Japan, Italy, France, Israel, China and Sweden need more SPAA overall.
I wouldn’t say Israel is in need of it “the most” in terms of top-tier SPAA with their SPYDER right?
oh yeah… i forgot they got the spyder XD
With germany
When you bring ROC into the equation, though, I can justify China easily in my head. ROC is the tightest fit for Singapore.
Maybe, but to say it was Britains only option is equally dishonest.
Except. Did it?
Sure, tehy added a load of light tanks, but its not exactly like Britian didnt/doesnt have native options for those that still havent been added.
We still have a MASSIVE hole in SPAA between 5.3 and 8.3 and yet we got SPAAGs from ZA at 5.3 and 8.3.
We just got the Badger in an update where we should have gotten the Sky Sabre or Ajax / late warrior variant. The badger is one of, if not the weakest IFV in the game at a BR where we already had usable IFVs if you were willing to uptier them a bit.
Sure, the South African tree was full of unique vehicles that werent just straight C&Ps. But none of them filled any holes that couldnt have been addressed without a sub-TT and what additions we did get, didnt actually fill any holes that we had and still have.
Now we have Soviet C&Ps being thrown in from India, and the tree is just getting worse. Im genuinely fearing the next major update and that we’ll get a soviet C&P top tier SAM instead of the Sky Sabre because it was simply easier
1 Like
I’m hoping we get more SARC variants foldered with the existing ones ngl
1 Like
Id say the priority should be Britain and Italy. Followed by France, and then Japan, China and Sweden.
Ukr for Rus?
(Plz no)
4 Likes
God, the USSR getting an F-35 and gripen would be awful.
5 Likes
That and the fact the Czechoslovakian ground tree would have over 180 vehicles with like 10 copy paste vehicles.
4 Likes
Given that South Africa was the only British sub tree at the time and there was no viable British alternative. Its very much a factual truth that the Gripen was not just the best, but the only viable candidate at the time.
It’s just too much vehicles for a sub tree
2 Likes
If the Spyder was actually good and consistent? sure.
At this point it’s the only vehicle that has ever made me alt+F4 on the spot, and I have played a lot of vehicles. If you asked me to choose between spawning the ADATS/ItO or the Spyder I would pick the former any day of the week.
2 Likes
Let’s hope that no candidate for the next in-game tech tree is going to be added as a sub tree🤞
1 Like
Welcome back to UK cope train…
19 Likes
The SPAA hole isnt anything new, thats a problem on so many nations its not worth mentioning, now if the Bosvark was a bad spaa like the skink (Referring to its poor velocity at 5.3) then yes id say they need a 5.x spaa but again thats not a new and exclusive problem to britain.
Additionally the argument that SA wasn’t what Britain needed applies to most other nations given gaijins implementation. Im still a firm supporter of Finlands removal and that Norway would be the better TT filler but if its handled the same way Finland is then it just becomes the new Slopland. So again moot argument.
Realistically most problems come from gaijin actively choosing vehicles a nation doesn’t need and calling it a day and forgetting about that nation.
I wanted a good SPAA for 5.x sweden, what i got was a slow unarmored 2 crew SPAA at 5.3 when Finland could’ve offered a far better option, now the USH is left unused because any plane can sit outside its range and fire some 7.62 rounds from 2km out and kill you.
Again most subtree additions are handled so poorly by gaijin it makes me wonder if they purposely do it so they can later sell the needed vehicles as a premium.
Welcome back? It never leaves ))
14 Likes
Daily occurrence at this point
Britain always has a priority with you sweetheart. ♥
Britain also has the second most light tanks/ifv’s of all TT’s with Sweden being number 1, so that IFV thingy must tone down a bit - everybody lacks IFV’s and light tanks.
Yeah, oke, maybe GB needs a SPAA at 6.3, 7.7 and 12.0, but thats really it IMHO.
:')
(speaks more than a thousand words)
2 Likes