Unfortunatly the shot kal D gets removed. Id take the pain and take it with a series of 9.3, its somewhat okay there. Sure, uptiers, but at least there are MTTD and VFM at the job, and it still does fine in 10.0 matches.
Again guess the L23 is the biggest let down, mobility was alright.
The Japanese aircraft carriers with completely made up planes and Japanese cruisers with completely made-up main guns π°
1 Like
Caspian sea monster in naval when? Sure it only has a bunch of 20mms, but uh, its fast and chonky
And completely made up Japanese battlecruisers with completely made up guns.
1 Like
There is also the changzheng which i heard of without playing wows. Dont ask why the soviets put a 457mm on a yamato class, or why is there a 4th ship in the first place.
1 Like
Well, they did plan 5, with No.4 being almost seaworthy before cancellation.
2 Likes
Why not both
Only advanced eagles would get 1k+ BOL, strike and air superiority eagles can only get up to 640 more like Gripen and F-14B
Am I missing something here? Sorry, just got off work and am tired butβ¦
The Tu-16 max payload capacity is like just short of 20,000lbs and the Statrofortress is like 70,000 lbs?
Maybe heβs talking about Tu-160?
The Soviet copy-and-paste B-1? Hmmm.
The one and only, but it would fit what he was saying
The Battlecruisers are odd in that most of them are clearly based on the No.13s and the Kii designs. A couple, though, are allegedly early Kongo and Amagi designs as well. Makes it even more ironic that the Amagi we got is within those same prelims
Aye, and the last one, from what I recall, was supposed to use newly designed 155mm turrets, which might explain the fake Cruisers.
2 Likes
I mean the H-6K, its entirely different internally, but its spiritually a Tu-16
How would you outbomb a stratofortress with an H-6?
So i can only attempt to
Anyways, at least half the nation in game dont know what strat bombing is
1 Like
Yep itβs only US USSR for full lines, UK with above average #, then China with the H-6 and France with the Mirage 4
sadly because we got the FV4030/3 as a event tank I take it that locks us out of getting the Challenger 1 Mk1 since they are very similar
Funny enough if we are going off of 1000lb bombs the Victor actually can carry more then the B-52 (35 compared to 30 ) the B-52 obviously has a far larger array of weapons it can carry (for example 51 500lb bombs that might actually have more explosive mass then the Victor)
Also reminder these would be the british HC 1000lb bombs with an almost 300kg explosive mass while the US one woulf be around 270 if I remember right in game
The soviets top end strat bomber the Tu-95 cant carry conventional bombs from what I can see and only has AGMs
Of course the B52H is faster, has a higher altitude and assuming its an early version has a weapon for self defence
Tu-160, that thing is a monster when it comes to payload