Then can you nudge these 2-3 year old bug reports which have massive impact on their respective missiles performance then please.
The number of times i’ve had a target not just within range according to the radar, but well and truly inside the LSZ and not even the slighest whiff of a lock with the Aim-9M is frustrating as hell.
When we should be able to lock onto a reheat target in front aspect at 14.45km but can barely get a lock half the time at 3km is just kinda stupid.
Or they should just remove paper weapons like KH-38MT and nerf AASM down to IRL performance and then AGM-65 would actually be pretty well balanced. Though AGM-65 being a little more consistant would be nice
tbh I think the only way to balance all this is to remove cas from ground battles, then only tanks won’t suffer from op cas and planes will be as op as they can be in ground attack but against bots
Ground battles cas should be bots like air battles tanks are bots
Has it truly been worked out that they’re paper though?
All I’ve seen in that thread is a bunch of going left and right and “other nations have it bad” type of thing.
Fair. So people calling it fake without actual solid proof might need to wait a little longer it seems.
( They cope about CAS without the knowledge of how to play against it or abuse it themselves, even if they remove the kh38 nothing will change lol)
It is fake until proven otherwise.
Uts existence needs to be proven. Until then the missle just doesnr exist.
And its not like the topic isnonly a few days old now
goes for literally most modern weaponry, that’s also the reason why im so against the devs pushing in more and more modern stuff into the game.
but hell, what do i know
I feel like a system where bug report moderators can rate the reports they get by the effect to gameplay if fixed, then have those looked at first would be a good idea. A lot of significant buffs and nerfs sometimes come from bug reports that were started 1 to 2 years ago and have been in the queue to be worked on for a long time