tf is that supposed to mean? Japan and Korea have always hated each other, Turkey and Iran have only more recently started to hate Israel?
1 Like
Why immediately in attack mode?
I’m just telling you, some very controversial things might happen this year and the next.
At least, if one of the 2 plans goes through.
(According to multiple sources of mine, one of them asked to not tell anything, so i won’t, but depending on one of the choices made, some controversial things will happen.)
Ukraine as a subtree for the USSR, for sure
3 Likes
Oh, no. That was planned in the summer of 2022, you know, when the M1 KVT pack got added and we got a 2 week break with dev-blogs due to a conflict starting.
1 Like
israel need a subtree, and thats good, azerbaijan good too
1 Like
They’ve been doing this for a few days, Israel’s best and only option is Chile
2 Likes
iran as RUSSIA subtree is absolutely funny, in the past two centuries iran and russia was two enemies against each others, its only about 35 years that the current unpopular government of iran have good relations with russia, iranian people dont like russian government because of the past two centuries events
even iran as a subtree for USA make MUCH MORE SENSE lol
im iranian myself
adding iranian f-14 to USA was a very very smart move by gaijin, i really thank them
4 Likes
New round of BR changes when?
Turkey with Central Asia should be as separate nation.
You don’t need a subtree, it’s a part of USSR anyway.
2 Likes
Anyone claiming that South Korea should go to the US
A: Doesn’t take into account the sheer amount of Korean players who said they shouldn’t when there was originally leaks for it
B: Is a glutton as the US has more than enough vehicles and by no means needs a subtree
C: Doesn’t take into account the fact that combined Korea has more than enough vehicles for a TT
And no quartas121, just because they’re allies doesn’t mean they should be a subtree. I also have you on ignored since you always cope about US this and US that in every thread about any vehicle or topic.
12 Likes
I like the idea of United Korea more, the only question for me is a flag of the TT. Although imo it isn’t a real issue, some feature which would allow to change in-game nation flag between for example DPRK and ROK shouldn’t be hard to implement, it can work for TTs with subtrees as well.
7 Likes
Well that was an unexpected nap but that 's what you get for staying up for like 27 hours
If they implement a split sim mm for United Korea it would work fine but they probably won’t so it most likely wouldn’t work for everyone else
ROKAF had sabre dogs, North Korea had MiG’s so it’ll just add onto the whole sim issue with visual IFF
The only way to make a split match maker is to add redfor and bluefor tags to vehicles.
5 Likes
That would be a good fix
For ground, should force certain vehicles to have ways to easily identify them, like a decal
Yeah then it would get Russia, East Germany and Hungary on the same side since it will be tag base not nation based.
I mean people can just pick which Germany they want to play no?
The only issue I see with Redfor/Bluefor right now is neutral nations (Sweden).
And then yeah I spose there is probably some implementation issues, but we don’t talk about that.
I think bluefor would work since they are either in NATO or set to be soon, not sure how far along that whole thing is.
Correct me if I’m wrong but doesn’t stuff like the Strv 103 use and L7 or license made L7 105mm? And didnt they have Sherman’s at some point too? And ofc, the Strv 121 and 122 which happened before they joined Nato