what holes does the Chilean air force fill for Israel?
And what holes even are there in the US?
Isreal needs a subtree not just to shore up its ground tree, but to expand on the air tree as well, Israeli air is the only tree with only 3 lines, the gap that needs filling is that whole 4th line, adding diversity to Israeli air, unfortunately Chile used a lot of the same aircraft as Israel, with Mirage III, Mirage 5, F-16A/C, so that doesn’t help as much as you might want.
Also, we’re getting away from the fact that we apparently want the near enough biggest nation in game to get South Korea, a huge subtree, that only actually adds like 5 new vehicles to it, while Israel, one of the smallest nations, has to be fine with Chile?
Not really air wise remove Belgium from Benelux and how many vehicles does that leave you?
So why would Benelux 2.0 be any different realistically?
At least we could see the CF-104 and the F 35, the main things is filling out the 5.X bravket and expanding on the lack 9f CAS while providing options for the rank V-VI blackhole of the worst experience for air. Any F16’s would be better than the Gripens so i could see gaijin leaving them out to focus on the other areas that need more work.
That’s not going to happen, and when someone on the forum makes a suggestion adding many vehicles to a sub tree, they do it to give gaijin options and he ultimately chooses the few that are added, it’s always been that way.
Sweden air yes, ground past 10.0 id say is a love child when it comes to MBT’s the CV90’s are broken just like most other IFV’s. Honestly id be fine if ground didn’t get a new shiny vehicle aside from spaa for a year if it means air got any actual love.
