Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

If Gaijin stop adding C&P there will just be a new group of dissidents that will be demanding C&P vehicles, it isn’t like the whole player base is against it, there are some for and some against, and with valid enough reasons on both sides, so Gaijin are just going to continue to do what they want, and C&P makes for easy filler vehicles and allows them to continue pumping out 40 vehicle updates 5 times a year which is what the community expect of them.

I mean C&P isn’t clearly defined in the first place.

1 Like

@Smin1080p_WT

Is there any specific reason why the APG-76 was denied in having MTI modes added?

In fact, the developer response was that the radar would not receive any further improvements.

Is there a specific explanation also for why a radar or aircraft would be refused in having any more improvements done to it?

For a long time, there’s been speculations that Gaijin refuses to action reports on certain vehicles in order to ensure those vehicles suit certain battle-ratings, but we never had such confirmation.

Here’s the reports I was referencing:

Spoiler

Spoiler

Soviet pershing? I dont play the US or soviet so i dont care, but not really neccessary though the object 248 is already mid enough

Regarding these reports, there appears to have been some discrepancies with the test, RCS specified and and modes spesifed. So no changes could be made as a result of these reports.

We have in fact confirmed the opposite multiple times.

I guess the plane is SB2C-5 either Thai or Marina Militare.

3 Likes

Could you go into detail? What were the discrepancies? Was something wrong with the source itself?

I’m speaking in specific reference to the missing MTI modes which are modeled on aircrafts in-game. I’m curious why “no further improvement” will be done in that regard.

This is not relivant to the topic and hand and I would prepferaby not like to trigger an off topic radar sprial.

The developer comment was as follows:

2m^2 RCS is not specified, 5m^2 RCS is used. Notch width for airborne target tracking mode is not specified, there is actuall no notch in A-Atracking mode, but in WT all MPRF radars have it.*

If you have further information that was not provided in these reports and wish too, please feel free to make a new report. These reports were concluded over a year ago.

1 Like

Sounds resaonable

What about a new era like WW1 aviation? It’s the last bug era we are missing in game. Granted we have some vehicles from that era but those are just a few naval vessels, it would be cool to see some representation of for aircraft of the time and maybe some tanks but I’m not sure those would be suited for the game. There’s been a few topics talking about it and some vehicle suggestions so there is some interest in the idea. Also it would be fun to see the beginning of air combat.

can anyone who can controll himself not buying too much models when model piles is already getting higher and higher?

Lemme guess.
Dutch B-25 and another magach?

Nobody sane anyway )

The game would have to evolve and we can only hope the developers wake up and realise they have all the tools and pieces to make a truly incredible game.

Not just the point click cod team death match crap we have

New twitch drop skins;

Spoiler

Rafale C

Yak 3U

PzH 2000 A1

New decal;

Spoiler

New event skin;

Spoiler

Not my info, all credit goes towards gszabi.

8 Likes

it’ll be fine at 13.3 with AMRAAM A and 9M

1 Like

It’ll be 13.7, if you actually look at 13.3 you’ll quickly realise the F/A-18C is better than all of them

Agreed, the game could be way better, and there could be a place fro strategic bombers, but as it is right now those three are the only viable additions, and even then, they would suck to play

The lowest magach still exceeds all bp vehicle br. While the PT7657 is higher its moved up there.

I would actually place my bet on a British pershing.

when are the twich drops coming??

It’s a Sherman isn’t it…

:(

Unless it’s an Egyptian thingy with an AMX-13 turret

:)