ah ok, good to know
Also think it’s likely we will see Stalingrad at some point. Believe the model is already in the files.
1 Like
cool battlecruiser ig
When next BR Changes?
We don’t know.
(sorry for the ping)
This Shinano talk is funny as she just came in today for me
6 Likes
Still they will have turtleback that is even better than Scharnhorst, while other battleships(except British)will be even more vulnerable when penned.
H and J has no difference in design, then only one of them could be in the game.
Though '90s Iowa is definitely worse than WW2 Iowas.
1 Like
Would have missiles, ciws, better radar, but less 5in and little to no 40mm
Gaijin already saids they are not interested in ‘modern’ naval missiles, and even they are implemented they are useless against armored ships(because they are not desgined to face such ships)
And CIWS is just anywhere worse than Bofors and Oerlikons. Only 20 seconds of burst, and it will silenced because of ammo shortage.
And you did not mention about crew too. More than 20% of crew diminished after modernization, which is huge nerf ingame.
I think modernish (90’s after all) missiles would be pretty effective against even armored vessels since, y’know, that’s what made them almost completely obsolete
what armored ship obsolete was guided bomb fall from high altitude bomber, and value for money compared to aircraft carrier. Modern missiles never was to be designed against armored vessels, and armoured vessels were already almost out of service when such missiles were developed.
Modern anti-ship missiles are mostly just HE-fragmentation warhead unless it’s warhead is too small to make enough fragmentation(in that case they use SAP). Exocet for case even use VT fuze to wide spread fragment against unarmored part of ships.
Next month, my guess
Uh, no, we tons of ship classes with more than one ship in the game.
What we can’t have is two versions of the same ship.
That is for comissioned ship. Stands different for non-comissioned ones. Only example of two different ship with same non-comissioned ships were Z-46 and Z-47, which has serious difference in AA armament design.
wait, so if missile ships get added, missile iowa will be excellent? bc they will be at much higher BR, and missile iowa is well armored and protected against most cold war and modern anti ships threats.
ww2 iowa will be good in current meta but bc of the extravagance of some laid down ships (they were never actually completed for a reason), it wont be that good which is why it should actually come in both a ww2 and early cold war version. one which is just ww2 iowa ofc, and the cold war one with the historical and correct W23 nuclear shells (15-20kt)
In such cases, people will bring old battleship to missile ships BR then.
While nuclear shell is not what super game-ending like nuke does in ground realistic, USS Missouri can’t use that shell because there are no storage for it. Also, we already have shell that isn’t in game though they can use such as Japanese Type 3rd round or British WW1 HE shells. Capital ships round is much more restricted in game rather than destroyers and cruisers.
but it cannot shoot down more advaned aircraft which can carry weapons that can destroy an iowa class. also its alleged that they carried nuclear tomohawk cruise missiles. each one can have 150kt warhead. it can carry 32 of them. it would be more unbalanced than only 20kt of W23 though
and theres no reason the W23 shouldnt be able to fit into the loading systems same as any other 16in shell for the iowa. even then, if its only missouri just add new jersey or iowa with it
It does not, you literally just made that up out of nowhere. This is not a thing.
If you believe so XD
Haha, nice!
1 Like