i mean, is that really something that can be counted? I mean its a unique modification of an american tank
the base shermans were sent over as part of lend lease iirc, so yeah id say it counts
1 Like
meh fairs,
agree to disagree?
1 Like
turns out those AA trucks werent lend lease, they were based off ford trucks but made in USSR, so there is in fact not one lend lease vehicle in the USSR tech tree
2 Likes
What you have shown is that Russia has 1 more lend lease than Britain, when IRL they received more lend lease and got it from two countries, and you neglected to mention that all Russian lend lease is premium
Also, nearly half or Russia’s lend lease is Air/Kingcobra
1 Like
I wouldn’t count the Firefly as lend-lease being a modification as most think lend-lease = C&P.
But speaking of Sherman, I can connect it to my primary point(of missing primary used C&P but having ones they had in small numbers), as the UK is missing its primary Sherman, the Sherman V.
well, there would be no firefly without the lend lease shermans it was converted from
idk why they havent added sherman V, isnt it already in italy?
close enough to count. we were fully expecting to go to war with Russia as we were acquiring them
yes. but we are missing the other shermans we used. We don’t have a 105 or 76 sherman yet.
Russia doesn’t need the bolstering as much. and them getting the Royal Sovereign when there isn’t one in its native tree was a slap in the face so its a sore point for some of the brit mains here. I don’t agree with it either but it does show a good chunk of preference when it comes to notable vehicles
1 Like
Yeh one more so it won’t hurt if we get our P-40 the same as Russia
new year in ww2 both sides
happy new year!
I’m not arguing you shouldn’t’, I’m saying you can’t complain that Russia gets preferential treatment on this when they clearly don’t, I’d actually argue Britain has better lend lease representation with them actually having TT lend lease, a fact you seem very keen to ignore
2 Likes
lend lease was a ww2 thing, any postwar vehicles would not be lend lease
then they should add said 105 and 76 shermans
1 Like
Happy year of the snake guys
The missiles here are python 3 and aspide both named after snakes
I can complain as much as I want as we all know Russia is gaijin baby and always will be
1 Like
The USSR now has 5 top tier battleships, you get three spawns in NRB. Arkhangelsk, if it wasn’t clear from her class name, is a British vessel called Royal Sovereign. Her most notable service was in the Royal Navy but was loaned to the soviets where it was neglected to the point that the guns were rusted shut (while loaded) and the turrets couldn’t move. Britain only has two accessible top tier ships for NRB and needed R S to have a lineup. This was a blatant case of soviet favouritism and would be foolish to claim it wasnt.
4 Likes
Yeah sure, but not when it comes to lend lease, if anything the P-63 should be in the Russian tech tree and completely out of the US one given that they never used the things, but instead Russia is stuck with 3 premiums and the US gets 3 in the tech tree
1 Like
where is the foxbat and foxhound then? and object 640?
It’s in a few trees, last I checked.
But that was exactly my point, Gaijin is inconsistent with its C&P for all nations.
Heck, this convo even pointed out that nations are missing vehicles that were primarily built for them yet other trees have the vehicle.
If you would like the full quote, I would appreciate not being misquoted thank you
1 Like
pretty strange of them to do this tbh