And it be the same answer as always.
After a Canadian Tech-tree or a Canada-ANZAC tree, the UK tree is the best placement for Canada.
(Also for the others the monarchy might be primarily symbolic but they still hold power as they are a member of the government)
Eh, the F-16 dorsal spine and CFT screws with the airframe shape too much. The canopy for 2 seaters looks too bloated/stretched out too. Imo, the F-15 does the 2 seaters canopy and CFT perfectly
It is recently thought to have PL12 as well.
Thing is it should have better range, after all it is stated to be 60miles, rather than 50 in game, which is same as known stat of SD10 which is export. It should perform similar if not better than AMRAAM-A kinetically.
I wouldn’t call that game breaking.
At-most it’s a minor inconvenience that a tank over-steers if you tap too long.
Also it is a complex issue; at least as complex if not more than armor arrays.
On top of that, it’s likely a bug fixed by an overhaul of the transmission simulation which could be very well in development.
This popped up in a Discord server, as much as we all like War thunder please argue with intelligent and awareness not board onto the emotional train and grab anything online just to prove a point !
Just because it’s online doesn’t mean it’s safe make sure you ask staff for permission.
But Su-30MK2 russian Air-to-Air weapons only (pre domestic chinese Air-to-Air weapons) huh ?
AIM-120C-3 & AIM-120C-4 lock-range same AIM-120A & AIM-120B ?
But maneuvrability better
The CFTs on the F-15 just make it look fat, whereas on the F-16 it makes it boxy but very utilitarian looking
And the canopy without the dorsal spine looks odd but with it it works quite well
Bruh not always British there been a ton from the US too
How is it complex? Each and every single other ground vehicle ingame has correct steering except for this family of vehicles.
Well it’s been 3+ years. Until that hypothetical overhaul came, this should have just been fixed within the current model.
Not “too long”; press A and the tank does a 180º. I had to enable the “drive with mouse” option exclusively for these tanks, in order not to lose all of my speed every time I wanted to make any turn…
This was quite recent. So might be a recent addition.
AMRAAM C wise, probably lock range increase and slight manoeuvrability increase. PL12 should be slightly better kinetically but overall similar which sticks to the statements of PL12 as AMRAAM C equivalent. Afterall it is a bigger missile.
The F-117 got leaked recently enough as well you know
The high profile ones are British though. The US one I remember off the top of my head was something to do with the screws on the Bradley or something like that
What did they leak though? Details on the EFT radar are very sensitive and critical information
There no high profiles ones they are all banned from being posted, stop making this a one nation issue.
The most high profile one was Chinese wasn’t it, they leaked the specs for their brand new tank round I think
Not really. They round out the intake area more but wouldn’t call it fat. And if you are talking about utility the CFT on the F-15 is significantly more useful than any other CFT I’ve seen
The dorsal spine and CFT on F-16 mess up what is otherwise a very clean looking aircract
Good point, forgot about that one. Chally 2 was the first big leak though no?
I mean the F-15 already has a pretty large body, it’s basically a box with wings, an engine, and cockpit, the CFTs make the box even bigger
CFT on the F-15 are much less prominent than the CFT on F-16 and EFT (which are unbelievably ugly)
Brother there a whole wiki page
Only three British Typhoons and a Challenger most leaks actually came from Russia
