Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

Game Discussion General Discussion
7067

Thats good to know (ngl kind of was on a personal worry that after a week of nothing, my strikemaster report/suggestion might just be left to the side without a reply/ignored due to lack of public information, nice to know gaijin are not 100% fixed on that stuff!), though I am 99% certain most the things I have researched are unlikely to come to WT any time soon if ever, least I can keep it to the side for “just in case” xD

returns to insanity of trying to figure out histories of random photographs

7068

there are several possibilities for the battle pass tank:

M24 chafee HVMS

image
image1280×853 68.4 KB

M-50 HVMS Super Sherman

image
image1038×738 51.6 KB

1 Like
7069

Technically both began/spent a bit of their lives as LL tanks I think? Though if it was like that I dont think we would be told copy-paste tank it would be an interesting addition.

1 Like
7070

Untitled
Untitled1920×853 270 KB

Update news everyone )))

2 Likes
7071

Smh no arleigh burke and big nuclear cruisers

7072

That was last year:

db2_ship_rtuxtun_0_1500x600_789e81b1e52b25e7cf223de246a2033c
db2_ship_rtuxtun_0_1500x600_789e81b1e52b25e7cf223de246a2033c1500×600 448 KB

7073

I mean the other, newer ones

7074

PESA radar, WVR PL-8 & PL-8B and ARH PL-12

WS-10A engine, WVR PL-8B & PL-10 and ARH PL-12

But outfitted AESA radar instead PESA radar ?

7075

not sure. I think it’s still PESA, J-10B is just some kind of transition state of J-10C, when AESA radar and some sub systems are not ready, so it only produced a few.
so I think one of the gap of J-10B and J-10C is if it has AESA?

7076

7077

Mitsubishi F-2 when?

3 Likes
7078

With YF-23 😁

7079

I am talking about the lend lease T26. The leak specifically says it’s an lend lease medium from the US.

1 Like
7080

You think the lend lease T26 would be less than 6.0?

Although i don’t think UK got their LL T26E3 in game yet either so it could be a UK T26 aswell.

7081

AAAAAHHHH why can we not have decent missile ships in War Thunder yet

1 Like
7082

not denying that, but just for additional context :

meteor uses a regular solid rocket booster on the first 2 seconds of its flight, so it’s actually decently fast off the rail

7083

No new BRs?

7084

France didn’t lease those M47s, they bought them

7085

what?

7086

Cus Gaijin forgets about the existance of naval battles. I honestly prefer that Gaijin fixes naval instead of adding more vehicles, having top tier coastal fleet in the same BR range as Destroyers and Cruisers doesnt help the grind out. Imagine having to kill a USS Pensacola in a Pfeil, or a USS Frank Knox with a La Combattante, spoiler you wont do anything.

They should decompress or separate Coastal Battles from Blue Water Battles. And of course i have to mention the excessive cost of RP for a top tier Coastal Fleet, its the same as a 11.0 Plane, they should reduce it or at least make it able for players to grind Coastal with Blue Water as they did with Ground and Helicopters.

Not to mention that most of the Coastal Fleet dont even have a purpose, why add depth charges when there are no subs, or why add missiles when there are no AI planes and most people dont spawn in air cus AAs already do their jobs, give them alt missions with AI like in Air Battles, at least they would have something to do rather than capturing zones and ruining battles for Battleships that dont have the speed to catch up these things rushing the caps in 7.0 Battles.

Gaijin fix your Naval and low BRs instead of adding copy paste top tier vehicles cus not even 60% of the playerbase have those BRs please. Thanks

2 Likes