Diversify gameplay options is a nice way of saying giving them Russian vehicles. Which makes everything so much blander. Between Germany, China, Italy and Sweden there’s more Russian vehicles out their tree than in it, I really don’t see the point.
CVRT and CVRW and F-111C were nice just keep doing that, it’s not so tricky.
Nah, i figured you probably were being sarky lol, I am just grieving the situation.
You missed 5, where they reject one commonwealth nation because “no British connection” to the vehicle, whilst asking for another commonwealth nations vehicle that has the same or even less connection to Britain ))
I need this for other nations. Mainly italy, where it would be:
On a similar subject, are you looking at Low Tier for Israel?
Its not planned to go below its existing ranks for now.
If the J-11B is really coming then surely, surely it would be along with 14.0 right gaijin?
I surely we can’t have a better flanker at the same BR as the Su-27SM, which in turn is a better flanker at the same BR as the J-11A.
Surely…
Sometimes what is true and necessary isn’t always what is kind.
Can you fix the CR1/2s?
Sure take a Indian Sub-tt and the T-90
Can you fix the Ariete?
Sure take a Hungarian Sub-TT and the Leopard
Can you fix the LeClercs?
Sure take a BeNeLux Sub-TT and the Leopard
I wonder what Israel is gunna get?
My god, he’s becoming one of them.
Spanish, i don’t mean to alarm you, but pretty soon you’ll be putting Bisto’s finest gravy on your Tapas.
You need an collection how often you had to say that India is an sub tree of the UK?
:)
Eurofighter won’t be at 13.7, so probably 14.0
So since SAAB worked on the F 35 getting is setup with bombs at the request of Denmark does that still mean it could go wherever the biggest screaming nation wants it? Im just saying it seems best with sweden considering we are more closely tied to each other and our nordic brothers than nations like Germany ect ect. Im just wanting more so to know whether the whole thing of who cries the loudest is what really matters here. Especially since DK and Nor aren’t part of sweden
It’s going to be gimped.
Imagine if it is worse than the Su-27SM even though it shouldn’t be.
Sooooo, India is a British sub-tree? 😅
There are times where I think we take it a bit too far and others that I think we are perfectly justified in our anger.
CR2s have some fundemental flaws that have 0 justification for not being fixed years ago.
Even less connection??? What vehicle are you refering to which could possibly have less connection to the UK than T-90S and Osa. This vehicle is on earth yes?
This is the issue Gaijin has with the mantlets of the Challengers and ZTZs:
They see “holes” in the trunnions and, instead of realising that they are part of the rotor mechanisms and gun anchor points, they appear to believe that the engineers just made them hollow for no particular reason other than to make them weaker.
Hell, even on the X-Ray module vision Challenger 2’s mantlet is properly modelled; but still hollow in the damage model.
Why is this not on the damage model?
