Smin I truly hope Gaijin pays you well , very well to put up with the brain rotted horde that we are.
2 Likes
1 Like
Yeah this is why I do not like to play 11.7 lol. 10.7 is safer, but if they could fix the silly replenishment rate on CR1 I’d be satisfied. There is absolutely no reason for moving one bag to take longer than an IS-2s entire reload.
Smin, I don’t want to bother you, and i only ask because in the past, the Snail was kind enough to address it when Japan was in a similar situation (in Q&A’s).
I do not expect any confirms or denials, but i just want to know, are the devs in any capacity considering or working on options for a top AA for Israel? They are extremely far behind all other nations in this regard.
I’ve been thinking abt the removed camo for the F-5E FCU recently. This one:
Since the F-5A(THA) and F-5T SCU appeared in game version 2.41.0.30, it seems like they’ll be coming soon. Maybe a techtree version of the FCU might be coming w/ them.
Sort of like how the Su-22M3 squadron vehicle first appeared as Hungarian, then turned into a Syrian one, and now has a techtree-researchable Hungarian alternate version.
4 Likes
We are always looking for new options to fill gaps in trees yes.
5 Likes
SPYDER Soon’tm
Does this mean Britain can finally get an SPAA at 8.3 :P
WDYM? AIM-9D with Stinger seeker is peak.
Fox and Scimitar are splendid additions and actually seeing a Cananada/NZ/Aussie vehicle in the tech tree for once has been great. More of that please. Keep those Indian T-72s and BMPs to yourself though seriously, we don’t need them :D
2 Likes
So if i was to say, want a Draken on sweden with bombs i could just ask for my home nation Denmark to get the F 35? I mean, its a Draken with bombs and would add to the TT, and it has nore connections since Sweden made the Draken than the F111. Or is it more likely that Denmark will go to another nation because they asked more?
One of the funniest ones is this.
See this? Gaijin LITERALLY FIXED IT ALREADY A YEAR AGO… and then they proceeded to REVERT THE FIX AND BREAK IT AGAIN. And now, they seem to actively refuse to fix it by simply reverting the fix revert…
See, here? The fix ALREADY EXISTS! But they won’t implement it! It’s been a year, what kind of quality control is this?
EDIT: I just realised that I came into this thread criticising British mains for raging about the state of U.K only to end up raging about the state of U.K myself. The irony…
7 Likes
Can you not diversify Britain’s gameplay options by adding more indigenous designs rather than more sub trees?
1 Like
You should have seen what they did with the Puma IFV. Gaijin implements the most armored IFV with a 5mm aluminum alloy front plate
2 Likes
Namer be like:
That’s exactly what we have been doing over the last year with many of the additions for the tree. But sub tree vehicles can often add things that domestic ones cant and also allows for the representation of other nations in game that cant have a full standalone tree, that equally people also want to see.
1 Like
Chaparral is a legitimately useless at top tier unfortunately.
It’s genuinely worse than Machbet.
Britain was directly involved in the F-111 program with their own variant on order. Since it wasn’t possible to add this addition and with Australia being a commonwealth nation (its vehicles can go to multiple trees, whoever is most relevant in that case) and with the F-111F coming for the USA, the F-111C absolutely was well connected to the British tree.
I guess you missed that, so let me add it now.
/s
1 Like
Lol
In case you were wondering ZTZ99A was an addition that’s almost three years old now.
And even today the left armor cheek is magically weaker then the right one by 100mm.
2 Likes