Have you seen the people who used classified docs trying to artificially nerf the J10? Some people are hard to understood. Some people in China love to stay weak and nerf their own vehicles.
1 Like
- using unconfirmed leak
- blames it on players
- didnt see those same players wondering why tf they get other peoples stuff when they have plenty of their own things to add
4 Likes
That leak was absolutely confirmed.
3 Likes
except it wasnt because if it was… where are these ASEAN vehicles? where is the 2A4 China was supposed to get? where’s the economy nerfs that leak list also mentioned?
1 Like
I did see that. I think it was more of a trying to get an accurate representation in the game rather than having a weak fighter. But they could possibly have a disdain to their own country who knows.
the leak was from a reliable source yes, but reliable sources can and frequently are wrong
By who?
And where was it confirmed?
1 Like
They didnt add it because everyone flipped tf out
3 Likes
so it’s an unconfirmed leak?
Issue is many(all) of these nations have options.
Sure they might not all be top tier, just because they don’t make as much nowadays mean they should get nothing.
They could get one of the many missing WW2 vehicles or early-mid cold war stuff skipped for the big name stuff. Or at worse C&P as I know many nations are missing C&P stuff that was mainstay of the nation.
3 Likes
My biggest issue with that argument is that its not universal.
Royal Navy should be the biggest tree by far, but we have joint fewest Rank VI ships in the game, heck, we have less than the soviets. A nation not really known for their maritime history.
I also would argue that if you look at every BR and not just top tier, then nations like Britain and France can easily match the number of additions the US gets on the regular basis for at least the next few years without running out of things to add
This is what our air tree could be like:
9 Likes
Im not going to tell you who because he told me that in confidence, but that and the planning for an economy nerf next year are true. He expressed frustration the community would fall for gaijins lying clean-up denials so easily.
2 Likes
lol ok bud
1 Like
Im not going to break a friends trust to win an internet argument.
2 Likes
me when i lie
Seriously, anyone at Gaijin who thinks an econ nerf is a good idea is an idiot. They should know what will happen if they nerf it.
1 Like
you’re missing the forest for the trees here.
The issue isn’t the US gets a lot of “X” because it made a lot of “X”
it’s that other nations that also made a lot of “X” don’t get a lot of “X”
France for example has a SLEW of light tanks, IFVs that they’ve manufactured since the cold war. Yet somehow their first 2 and only in game IFVs were in the form of a premium, and a squadron tank that’s not even french.
6 Likes
Yeah, the situation of the British Navy is… odd.
Gaijin is literally going to give Russia a Revenge-Class before giving U.K a Queen Elizabeth lmao (no, event vehicles don’t count).
Also, Barham has an EXTREMELY GIMPED survivability because her draft is comically shallow…
Germany got THREE (3) Bayern-Class ships before U.K got a single ship of the class Bayern was meant to be a counterpart of on the researchable tree…
And, as you said, the fact that the Russian tree is one of the best ingame even though it was the weakest in real life is comical, hahah.
But ever since I started joining matches on the CIS region servers, and I’ve noticed that I see more Izmails, Kommunas, Mariyas, Poltavas and Kronshtadts than all other ship classes from all other nations combined over there… I can imagine that’s why Gaijin is so… proactive with the Russian bluewater tree.
2 Likes
And your point is?
That is why Chinese TT does not have a consultant at all, even for Taiwan. Plus the classified docs are for the early prototypes not suitable for combat. J-8F is a similar case which possibly also resulted in the K2K losing its sparrows.
1 Like
Which is the real issue. Gaijin prioritises the trees that are popular, often to the detriment of the other trees. Which does make a certain degree of sense and wouldnt necessarily be an issue if the additions the minor nations got were really good and polished. But alas, they are rarely either.
Problem is that they go too far and often push players away from the minor nations more often than not
5 Likes