Next Major Update - Rumor Round-Up & Discussion (Part 1)

What argument i’m not trying to argue but i’m trying to gather information and share mine.

No that’s a block 2 or 3 SH equivalent, j-11b is a block 1 equivalent

That’s only super hornets

yeah but i am not gonna argue that for the x time

the future of war thunder and more modern missles is just that USA gonna suck more and more, nearly every country developed / uses better missles then american counterparts at this point.
Iris-t, asraam etc etc
meteor and all the other missles
all better then aim 120 and aim 9x, the only thing US missles are good at is being cheap.

and everytime it gets brought up us mains start crying muh aim 260 and aim 174.
With the aim 260 just finishing development not being in active service , the aim 174 being giant completly killing the planes performance, not to mention needing an awacs so you outrange stuff in the first place

nah wont start that argument again

3 Likes

The lack of contructive criticism that would be useful to the devs here is kind of funny. Arguing amongst yourselves about an update that isn’t out about things you can’t control, which is getting y’all knowhere. This ain’t a gaijin board meeting, and none of you are talked by to gaijin, so your opinions aren’t going to make any difference. Besides, if you can’t come to an agreement, nobody will be happy if gaijin listens to one of you. You’re yapping for the sake of yapping. 🍿

Tbh most US aircraft can use datalink so awacs isn’t necessary a lot of the time

Cool I see your point I don’t fully agree with it but I won’t discuss it father because you don’t want to.

once again, how does that work in war thunder for you?

If one aircraft can see a target on radar, it can datalink target information to another allowing it to fire on that target where it otherwise wouldn’t have been able to

nice for you, so useless in war thunder.
thank you for confirming what i said the whole time.

And if they implemented it? Many aircraft in game are capable of using it

Dude he said he didn’t want to argue it…

but yeah exactly why i said it, us mains starting to cry but myy missle, which wont perform as it should be and starting to justify its existence however they could

Yeah I agree most of us mains are like that. I agree with some of there ideas but they complain too much. I am a us main but I don’t think our missiles is what make our aircraft strong (irl) and there are other things that would make us more competitive in the coming years (in game).


9 Likes

oh yeah wont argue that, US armament is shit, but the aircraft itself are great
problem comes to the point when other nations buy US aircraft but add superior missles to them, like the japanese F-15 did with the AAM3/4 and then US players starting to cry why they dont have the best X type of that vehicle in the game. Which will just happen more and more.
Gajins holding back israelian planes would perform way better as well

Have a like, sir

1 Like

assuming its the tranche 1 BLK 5 with aim120B and Aim9l/i or aim9l/i-1 and started in production in 2003 but that could change soon

1 Like

Radars, datalink (hopefully), EW systems, pure payload for strike eagles and advanced eagles, a2g weapons such as the gbu-53 and jassms, jsows, SLAM missiles, all the HARMs. 120D won’t be horrible either just not as good as meteors, same with 9x and it’s contemporaries.

We will lack in pure dogfight performance until the F-22 and even then eurofighter holds some advantages.

wym